Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. D. Burt, E. Goldstein, S. Manski, S. J. Miller, E. A. Palsson and H. Suh, Crescent configurations, arXiv:1509.07220v1 [math.CO] (24 September 2015); Definitions 1.1 and 1.2 on p. 2. The copy read is identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: both definitions were read clause by clause on the page images. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Statement
Definition 1.1 (General Position, p. 2). Points in are in general position when no of them lie on one hyperplane and no of them lie on one hypersphere.
Definition 1.2 (Crescent Configuration, p. 2). "We say points are in crescent configuration (in ) if they lie in general position in and determine distinct distances, such that for every there is a distance that occurs exactly times."
Since , the multiplicities account for every pair of points (p. 1); the paper explains the name by the increasing multiplicities (p. 2).
Proof pointer
A definition; nothing to prove. Figure 1 (p. 2) gives the coordinates of Palásti's eight-point planar example, , , , , , , , , attributed to the paper's reference [Pal89].
Dependencies
None.
Bears on
- Problem 217: for , general position is the problem's "no three on a line and no four on a circle", and the multiplicity condition is the problem's requirement that the distinct distances can be ordered so that the th occurs times; the problem asks for which a planar crescent configuration of points exists. The definition decides no instance.