Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Lemma 11 — the constrained unramified pro-2 group


Statement

Let TT be a finite set of odd rational primes and let SQS_{\mathbb Q} be another finite set of rational primes. Assume that an odd number of members of TT are congruent to 33 modulo 44. Put

PT=∏q∈Tq,Q0=Q(PT),MT=Q(q:q∈T).(1)P_T=\prod_{q\in T}q, \qquad Q_0=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{P_T}), \qquad M_T=\mathbb Q(\sqrt q:q\in T). \tag{1}

Let GG be the Galois group over Q0Q_0 of the compositum of all Galois extensions of Q0Q_0 which

  • have degree a power of 22;
  • are unramified at every finite place and totally real;
  • give inertia degree at most 22 to every prime over p∈SQp\in S_{\mathbb Q}; and
  • give inertia degree at most 11 when pp is inert in Q0/QQ_0/\mathbb Q.

Write d(G)d(G) for the minimal number of pro-22 generators and r(G)r(G) for the minimal number of relations in a presentation on d(G)d(G) generators. Then:

  1. MT/Q0M_T/Q_0 is everywhere unramified and totally real, with Gal⁡(MT/Q0)≅(Z/2Z)∣T∣−1\operatorname{Gal}(M_T/Q_0)\cong(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^{|T|-1}. Its inertia degrees at the selected primes are at most 22, and at most 11 when the rational prime is inert in Q0Q_0.
  2. d(G)≥∣T∣−1d(G)\geq|T|-1.
  3. One has
r(G)≤d(G)+∣SQ∣+#{p∈SQ:p splits in Q0}+2.(2)r(G)\leq d(G)+|S_{\mathbb Q}| +\#\{p\in S_{\mathbb Q}:p\text{ splits in }Q_0\}+2. \tag{2}
  1. In particular, GG is infinite if
∣T∣+∣SQ∣+#{p∈SQ:p splits in Q0}+1≤(∣T∣−1)24.(3)|T|+|S_{\mathbb Q}| +\#\{p\in S_{\mathbb Q}:p\text{ splits in }Q_0\}+1 \leq\frac{(|T|-1)^2}{4}. \tag{3}

Proof of (1)

The full multiquadratic extension MT/QM_T/\mathbb Q has group (Z/2Z)∣T∣(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^{|T|}. Since Q0Q_0 is its quadratic subfield cut out by the product of all the square classes, MT/Q0M_T/Q_0 has the asserted rank ∣T∣−1|T|-1.

If ∣T∣=1|T|=1, then MT=Q0M_T=Q_0 and unramifiedness is immediate. For ∣T∣≥2|T|\ge2 and each q∈Tq\in T, the quadratic extension Q0(q)/Q0Q_0(\sqrt q)/Q_0 lies in the biquadratic field generated over Q\mathbb Q by q\sqrt q and PT/q\sqrt{P_T/q}. A place that ramifies in this relative quadratic extension must lie over a rational place ramified in both Q(q)\mathbb Q(\sqrt q) and Q(PT/q)\mathbb Q(\sqrt{P_T/q}). No odd prime ramifies in both because qq and PT/qP_T/q are coprime. At 22, exactly one of qq and PT/qP_T/q fails to be 11 modulo 44: the total number of prime factors that are 33 modulo 44 is odd. Thus 22 does not ramify in both quadratic fields. Each Q0(q)/Q0Q_0(\sqrt q)/Q_0 is therefore unramified, and so is their compositum MT/Q0M_T/Q_0. It is totally real because all qq are positive.

Every element of Gal⁡(MT/Q)\operatorname{Gal}(M_T/\mathbb Q) has order at most two, so every rational-prime inertia degree in MT/QM_T/\mathbb Q is at most two. If pp is inert in Q0/QQ_0/\mathbb Q, its inertia degree there is already two; multiplicativity in the tower makes its relative inertia degree in MT/Q0M_T/Q_0 equal to one. This verifies all local constraints in the definition of GG.

Proof of (2)

Part (1) makes (Z/2Z)∣T∣−1(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^{|T|-1} a quotient of GG. Generator rank cannot increase on passing to a quotient, so d(G)≥∣T∣−1d(G)\geq|T|-1.

Proof of (3)

Let G′G' be the Galois group of the maximal totally real, everywhere finite-unramified pro-22 extension of Q0Q_0, before the inertia constraints at SQS_{\mathbb Q} are imposed. The number of primes of Q0Q_0 over the rational primes in SQS_{\mathbb Q} is

m=∣SQ∣+#{p∈SQ:p splits in Q0}.(4)m=|S_{\mathbb Q}| +\#\{p\in S_{\mathbb Q}:p\text{ splits in }Q_0\}. \tag{4}

For a prime over a rational pp inert in Q0Q_0, impose that its Frobenius be trivial. At each other prime in (4), impose that the square of Frobenius be trivial. These are exactly the residue-degree bounds defining GG. Thus GG is obtained from G′G' by adjoining at most mm pro-22 relations. At each step, a new relation either removes one minimal generator or increases the minimal relation count by at most one. Consequently

r(G)−d(G)≤r(G′)−d(G′)+m.(5)r(G)-d(G)\leq r(G')-d(G')+m. \tag{5}

The external input is Neukirch--Schmidt--Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, second edition, Springer Grundlehren 323 (2008), Theorem 10.7.12. The same numbered statement was checked in the authors' corrected electronic version 2.3 (May 2020), printed p. 675 (physical p. 689). In the specialization used by the source, take its S=T=∅S=T=\varnothing and p=2p=2, treat C/R\mathbb C/\mathbb R as ramified, and use that the real quadratic field Q0Q_0 has r=r1+r2=2r=r_1+r_2=2, δ=1\delta=1, and θ=1\theta=1. The sums and remaining terms vanish, so the final inequality of that theorem gives χ2(G′)≤3\chi_2(G')\leq3. Since here

χ(G′)=1+r(G′)−d(G′),\chi(G')=1+r(G')-d(G'),

it follows that r(G′)−d(G′)≤2r(G')-d(G')\leq2. Insert this and (4) into (5) to obtain (2).

Proof of (4)

The second external input is the refined Golod--Shafarevich criterion in the form Sawin attributes to Gaschütz and Vinberg: a nontrivial finitely generated pro-22 group satisfying

r(G)≤d(G)24(6)r(G)\leq\frac{d(G)^2}{4} \tag{6}

is infinite. The manuscript cites Golod--Shafarevich (1964), Vinberg (1965), and Helmut Koch, Zum Satz von Golod-Schafarewitsch, Mathematische Nachrichten 42 (1969), 321--333, DOI 10.1002/mana.19690420413.

By (2), condition (6) follows if

∣SQ∣+#{p∈SQ:p splits in Q0}+2≤d(G)24−d(G).(7)|S_{\mathbb Q}|+\#\{p\in S_{\mathbb Q}:p\text{ splits in }Q_0\}+2 \leq\frac{d(G)^2}{4}-d(G). \tag{7}

The right side is increasing in the relevant range d(G)≥4d(G)\geq4. Replacing d(G)d(G) by the lower bound ∣T∣−1|T|-1 from part (2) turns (7) exactly into (3). Condition (3) cannot hold in the excluded smaller range, so the replacement loses no case. This proves infinitude.

Source and dependency scope

This is Lemma 11 and equations (9)--(10) on physical pp. 9--11 of the arXiv v1 manuscript. The multiquadratic and quotient arguments are reconstructed. The stated specialization of Neukirch--Schmidt--Wingberg was checked in the identified author-hosted electronic edition. It and the refined Golod--Shafarevich criterion are external theorems and are not proved here.

Used by. [[discrete_geometry/sawin_2026_explicit_lower_bound_unit_distance_problem/lemma_12|Lemma 12]].

Bears on. Problem 90.