Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Lemma 4.1 (p. 5), titled "Projection shadow". Let be a Euclidean subspace and let points , , all have squared norm . Let be a vector of a larger ambient space and its orthogonal projection onto . Suppose that for constants every has . Fix and choose with
Then satisfies when , and when .
The lemma assumes a positive satisfying (17); it does not assert that one exists. Section 5 applies it on p. 6, citing it as "theorem 4.1".
Source. Yibo Ji, An AI Generated Counterexample to Borsuk Problem in Dimension 63, arXiv:2608.12561v1 (12 August 2026), withdrawn by version 2 of 14 August 2026; Lemma 4.1 on p. 5. The source card records the withdrawal and provenance.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the PDF.
Proof pointer
Since each lies in , projecting does not change its inner product with . Expanding and substituting (17) gives both cases; the strict inequality uses and (p. 5).
Dependencies
None.
Bears on
- E0505: only through Theorem 6.2, whose added point is this lemma's with , , and (p. 6). The lemma alone says nothing about the number of parts.