Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Published pp. 228–231, Lemma 3.9 and its proof. (canonical PDF).
As printed (p. 228): let be an arbitrary simplex with circumradius and let be an arbitrary real. Then there is a simplex with which is -hyper Ramsey for , and such that for all (inequality (17)). Since Definition 3.1 needs , the printed weak radius bound is completed below by a strict one.
Form proved here. Let be a simplex of positive dimension, with circumradius , and let . There is a simplex such that
and is -hyper-Ramsey for the strictly positive number
In particular . The proof is complete relative to the exact external inputs theorem_2_2 and lemma_2_3.
Proof.
Center at its circumcenter and first divide its coordinates by . Write for the least distance between these normalized vertices. Choose a positive rational number so small that
The strict rational choice both handles rescaling of squared distances and leaves room for a final radius enlargement. Apply Lemma 2.3 with and , obtaining and a -dimensional unit sphere in a subspace of . Map the normalized simplex isometrically to that subspace and choose spread vectors within of its vertices. Both the original and spread vectors have norm one, so
Since , these spread vectors are distinct. Hence their underlying -sets are distinct members of the full family of sets. Fix their indices once and for all.
Put and
for positive integers . Then
All parameters of Lemma 3.5 are admissible. Apply its construction and select the rows associated with the chosen spread vectors. Their vectors are linearly independent, so form a simplex. Remark 3.8 shows that, as varies, this simplex has one fixed congruence class. Multiply it by and call the resulting fixed target .
Lemma 3.5 gives squared-distance error at most from the spread vectors before scaling. Combining the two errors and restoring the factor gives error at most from . Its selected vectors all have squared norm
It remains to construct density witnesses for this fixed . For each , let be all ordered partitions with the part sizes in Lemma 3.5, and map a partition to the vector having value on its part , where . Let . Every vector has norm , and .
This map need not be injective. Group the labels according to their common value . For each distinct value , put . Every vector in has exactly coordinates with value . To recover its labeled partition, split those positions into the label parts of prescribed sizes. Thus every fiber has the same size
It follows that every has an inverse image of exactly the same relative density in .
Let be the full joint intersection array of the selected constructed partitions. It is obtained by summing the other coordinates of the full -row array. Every cell has size at least ; all one-row marginals are the common positive integers . Theorem 2.2 therefore gives a fixed , independent of , such that every inverse image of density at least contains partitions with joint array . Their vector images have exactly the same norms and pairwise squared distances as the selected vectors: each squared distance is the sum of over the corresponding pair-label intersection. Hence their images contain a congruent copy of . The constant-fiber calculation proves the required weak density threshold for itself, including when some vanish or coincide.
We have witnesses on for every , with a fixed target, cardinality base and density base. Fact 3.10 extends them to every sufficiently large dimension, on the same sphere. Finally let
The radius enlargement in definitions places witnesses exactly on in every sufficiently large , adjusting the density exponent by a fixed factor. Since in its original realization, . Therefore , as required.
Source precision.
The source normalizes the circumradius and assumes rational without spelling out the effect on absolute squared-distance error. The smaller rational and the final radius lift prove its exact stated conclusion for every real and every positive . They also ensure distinct selected spread vectors and strictly positive slack. The source's “natural correspondence” (p. 230) between vectors and partitions is not necessarily one-to-one; the constant-fiber proof is necessary in that generality. Positive-dimensional simplices are the range here; singletons are handled directly by the main theorem.
Bears on. #174.