Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Published p. 231, Fact 3.10 and its proof; the bounded-gap version also completes the dimension step in Lemma 3.4. (canonical PDF).
As printed (p. 231): let , and be fixed and let be an infinite arithmetic progression. If is a finite set such that for every there is a set satisfying (i)–(iii) of Definition 3.1, then is -hyper Ramsey.
Bounded-gap form proved here. Fix a finite nonempty configuration and constants , and . Suppose an unbounded increasing sequence of positive integer dimensions has bounded gaps and, for every sufficiently large , has a nonempty witness with such that every -free subset has density less than .
Then the same fixed target and radius admit such witnesses in every sufficiently large dimension, with replaced by a smaller positive constant. In particular, if and for a fixed positive integer , then is -hyper-Ramsey.
Proof.
Let bound the gaps, and for each large integer choose the largest available . Then , so for all sufficiently large . Pad every vector of with zero coordinates. This is an isometry into , and .
Set , so . Every -free subset has density strictly less than
Thus a subset whose density is at least the last quantity must contain , with the weak forcing endpoint preserved. The arithmetic progression in Fact 3.10 is the case . The proof also permits a finite initial segment of dimensions to be absent.
Source precision.
The target and radius are fixed before the dimension varies. This argument cannot transfer witnesses for a varying sequence of noncongruent targets.
Bears on. #174.