Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Lemma 1, p. 180, of G. Csizmadia, On the Independence Number of Minimum Distance Graphs, Discrete Comput. Geom. 20 (1998), 179--187, DOI 10.1007/PL00009381; see the source card.
Statement
Lemma 1 (p. 180, quoted). "Every minimum distance graph has an independent set of vertices such that if is the number of vertices in , incident to at least one element of , then ."
Here a minimum distance graph is the graph on a finite plane point set of minimum distance joining the pairs at distance exactly (p. 179).
Proof pointer
Section 2 (pp. 180--183). In outline: a vertex of degree , and some small configurations of degree- vertices, give such a set at once, so all degrees may be taken at least . The proof then follows the outer boundary of the graph; going round it turns through , and only degree- vertices turn counterclockwise, so they must outweigh the clockwise turns at degree- and degree- vertices. A grouping of the boundary vertices into blocks and a case analysis then produce , with Lemma 2 (p. 181) and Lemma 3 (p. 183), proved in Section 3 (pp. 183--187), handling the turn estimates and a run of degree- vertices. For a run of the boundary path with , (), total turn (the turn at being , p. 181) and , having at most six neighbours altogether, Lemma 3 gives independent vertices with at most vertices incident to at least one of them, and for every .
Dependencies
Lemmas 2 and 3 and the Claim of Section 3 of the same paper, auxiliary results not recorded separately. Read depth: claims checked; the statement was read clause by clause on the print, and the proof was read but not checked step by step.
Bears on
- Problem 1066: through the Theorem, which iterates the lemma to get .