Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Lemma 2.1, p. 2, of N. Alon, Economical coverings of sets of lattice points, Geom. Funct. Anal. 1 (1991), no. 3, 225--230, doi:10.1007/BF01896202, read in the author's manuscript named on the source card; pages here are that manuscript's printed pages, and the journal pagination was not compared.
Statement
Setting as in Theorem 1.1: is the set of integer vectors in , a line is determined by a set when it contains at least two of its points, and is the least size of a subset of whose determined lines cover .
Lemma 2.1 (p. 2). There is a positive constant , depending only on , such that for every subset of of cardinality , the lines determined by cover at most points of . Consequently, for every there is a positive constant with
At the lines of points of the by grid cover at most grid points, and .
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the argument before it (pp. 1--2) were read clause by clause on the page images; the "simple calculation" bounding the cut-off was not redone here. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pp. 1--2. A line with at least two grid points has a primitive integer direction ; its type is . Such a line holds at most grid points, and there are at most directions of type (the paper's Fact, p. 2). A set of points determines at most lines in one direction, so at most lines of type , and at most lines in all. Maximizing under these constraints fills the types up to about , which gives the bound ; a covering set must cover all points.
Dependencies
No external result.
Bears on
- Problem 798: the case gives , the lower half of the estimate. The paper attributes the bound to Erdős and Purdy's remark that it is not hard to see (p. 1); the lemma supplies a proof in every dimension.