Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Proposition 4.3 (p. 8). Let be pairwise coprime integers. Then for any group the -tuple is not -harmonic: there are no subgroups with and elements with pairwise disjoint.
The are positive, since a -harmonic tuple consists of indices. The statement falls under the paper's convention, from Section 3 on (p. 5), that every group is finite; the reduction recorded on the Theorem B page extends it to groups in general. The paper notes (p. 8) that Zhu proved it earlier ([Zhu08, Theorem 3.1]).
Source. L. Margolis and O. Schnabel, The Herzog-Schönheim conjecture for small groups and harmonic subgroups, Beitr. Algebra Geom. 60 (2019), no. 3, 399--418, doi:10.1007/s13366-018-0419-1. Labels and pages are those of arXiv:1803.03569v1, the edition the source card names: the proposition is on p. 8, its proof on pp. 8--9.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause against the print. The proof was read for its structure only; nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
pp. 8--9. Write (Notation 3.3, p. 5). Disjointness forces . Two claims, using Corollary 3.11 and Lemma 3.10, show that for any three of the subgroups, the number of their three pairs with is zero or three; Proposition 3.8 then rules out the all-ones pattern, so every . In that case the product sets each have size and pairwise intersections of size , and the counting identity of Lemma 3.1 makes their common intersection empty, though it contains .
Dependencies
Lemmas 3.1, 3.4 and 3.10, Corollaries 3.6 and 3.11, and Proposition 3.8 of the same paper.
Bears on
- Problem 274: an input to the proofs of Theorem B (one of the two -tuple forms) and Theorem A, where it excludes index sets containing . It is one of the four obstructions the Itabe claim page lists under Depends on.