Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source: arXiv v2, p. 3, Theorem 3; proof on pp. 6--7.

Statement

There is an absolute constant c>0c>0 such that every finite covering system A\mathcal A of multiplicity s≥1s\ge1 has smallest modulus at most

exp⁡(clog⁡2(s+1)log⁡log⁡(s+2)).(1)\exp\left(\frac{c\log^2(s+1)}{\log\log(s+2)}\right). \tag{1}

Full proof relative to the stated external inputs

If the family contains modulus 11, (1) is immediate. Otherwise write its moduli as 1<d1≤⋯≤dn1<d_1\le\cdots\le d_n and use the notation of the distortion setup.

First consider large ss. Put y=Cs3y=Cs^3, where the absolute constant CC will be fixed below. Let kk be the largest index with pk≤yp_k\le y, with the convention k=0k=0 if no such prime divides QQ. Set

δi=0(i≤k),δi=12(i>k).\delta_i=0\quad(i\le k), \qquad \delta_i=\frac12\quad(i>k).

Using the first term in the minimum when δi=0\delta_i=0 and noting that the second denominator is 11 when δi=1/2\delta_i=1/2, define

η1=∑i≤kMi(1),η2=∑k<i≤JMi(2).(2)\eta_1=\sum_{i\le k}M_i^{(1)}, \qquad \eta_2=\sum_{k<i\le J}M_i^{(2)}. \tag{2}

By Lemma 3.3(b), followed by the standard Chebyshev upper bound π(t)≪t/log⁡t\pi(t)\ll t/\log t and partial summation,

η2≪s2∑p>y(log⁡p)6p2≪s2(log⁡y)5y=(log⁡(Cs3))5Cs.(3)\eta_2\ll s^2\sum_{p>y}\frac{(\log p)^6}{p^2} \ll\frac{s^2(\log y)^5}{y} =\frac{(\log(Cs^3))^5}{Cs}. \tag{3}

The supremum of the last expression over s≥1s\ge1 tends to zero as C→∞C\to\infty. Fix CC so large that η2<1/2\eta_2<1/2.

Choose a preliminary absolute constant c0c_0 and set

xs=exp⁡(c0log⁡2(s+1)log⁡log⁡(s+2))x_s=\exp\left(\frac{c_0\log^2(s+1)}{\log\log(s+2)}\right)

and suppose for a contradiction that d1>xsd_1>x_s. Lemma 3.3(a) gives

η1≤s∑d>xsP+(d)≤y1d.(4)\eta_1\le s\sum_{\substack{d>x_s\\P^+(d)\le y}}\frac1d. \tag{4}

For all sufficiently large ss, one has xs≥yx_s\ge y and y≥(log⁡xs)3y\ge(\log x_s)^3. Moreover

u=log⁡xslog⁡y=c0log⁡2(s+1)log⁡(Cs3)log⁡log⁡(s+2)∼c03log⁡slog⁡log⁡s.(5)u=\frac{\log x_s}{\log y} =\frac{c_0\log^2(s+1)} {\log(Cs^3)\log\log(s+2)} \sim\frac {c_0}3\frac{\log s}{\log\log s}. \tag{5}

Consequently ulog⁡u=(c0/3+o(1))log⁡su\log u=(c_0/3+o(1))\log s. Choose c0c_0 sufficiently large. The external smooth-number estimate in Lemma 3.4 then makes the sum in (4) less than 1/(2s)1/(2s) for all sufficiently large ss. Thus η1<1/2\eta_1<1/2 and η1+η2<1\eta_1+\eta_2<1.

Choose SS so that the preceding argument applies whenever s>Ss>S. For completeness, the finitely many multiplicities s≤Ss\le S can be handled by the same criterion without an asymptotic assertion. Choose YY large, set

U=⌊Y1/4log⁡Y⌋,X0=YU,U=\left\lfloor\frac{Y^{1/4}}{\log Y}\right\rfloor, \qquad X_0=Y^U,

and take the cutoff YY. For large YY, U≥1U\ge1 and

Y≥(log⁡X0)3,Y\ge(\log X_0)^3,

because Ulog⁡Y≤Y1/4U\log Y\le Y^{1/4}. The right side of (3), with s≤Ss\le S and y=Yy=Y, tends to zero. At the same time, Lemma 3.4 bounds (4), with x=X0x=X_0, by

S O ⁣(log⁡YUU),S\,O\!\left(\frac{\log Y}{U^U}\right),

which also tends to zero. Hence one common finite X0X_0 bounds the smallest modulus for every 1≤s≤S1\le s\le S. Since log⁡2(s+1)/log⁡log⁡(s+2)>0\log^2(s+1)/\log\log(s+2)>0 in this finite range, choose the final constant c≥c0c\ge c_0 so that the right side of (1) is at least X0X_0 for all these ss. For s>Ss>S, an assumed violation of (1) also gives d1>xsd_1>x_s, so the preceding large-ss argument with the unchanged threshold xsx_s still applies.

We have therefore arranged, for every s≥1s\ge1 and under an assumed violation of (1),

∑j=1Jmin⁡{Mj(1),Mj(2)4δj(1−δj)}<1.\sum_{j=1}^J\min\left\{M_j^{(1)}, \frac{M_j^{(2)}}{4\delta_j(1-\delta_j)}\right\}<1.

The exact external distortion criterion says that A\mathcal A then fails to cover Z\mathbb Z, a contradiction. Thus (1) holds.

The printed proof gives the asymptotic large-ss calculation and leaves the finite range implicit; the common-X0X_0 paragraph supplies that routine closure. Also, its final asymptotic for uu omits the factor 1/31/3 coming from log⁡(Cs3)∼3log⁡s\log(Cs^3)\sim3\log s. The corrected relation (5) has the same consequence after enlarging the unspecified absolute constant cc.

Bears on

  • Problem 2. At s=1s=1 the theorem bounds the least modulus of every covering system with distinct moduli by an unspecified absolute constant; it is not a new explicit improvement on the density paper's bound.