Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Hough, Lemma 4, printed pp. 374–375 of the published paper. Use the notation in the sieve setup.
Statement. For every integer and ,
Complete proof. Let . The CRT identification of the excluded events gives
Raise to the integer power , expand the finite sum into ordered tuples , and average with . Each simultaneous system is either inconsistent or specifies exactly one class modulo : two solutions differ by a multiple of every , hence of , and any one solution generates the whole class. Its mass is therefore at most .
For a fixed , there are at most such tuples, because is a subset of the divisors of and counts all ordered tuples with that least common multiple. Summing this bound over gives exactly .
Source precision. Restricting the tuple sum to avoids assigning a residue to a modulus absent from , which is implicit in the printed sum over all divisors. This proof needs the moduli to be distinct; arbitrary repetitions would add multiplicities.
Bears on. Problem 2.