Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Hough, Lemma 4, printed pp. 374–375 of the published paper. Use the notation in the sieve setup.

Statement. For every integer k≥1k\ge1 and n∈Ni+1n\in\mathcal N_{i+1},

1Ti∑r∈Siμi(r)an(r)k≤βk(i)k.\frac1{T_i}\sum_{r\in S_i}\mu_i(r)a_n(r)^k\le\beta_k(i)^k.

Complete proof. Let Dn={m0∣Qi:m0n∈M}D_n=\{m_0\mid Q_i:m_0n\in\mathcal M\}. The CRT identification of the excluded events gives

an(r)≤∑m0∈Dn1{r≡am0n(modm0)}.a_n(r)\le\sum_{m_0\in D_n} 1_{\{r\equiv a_{m_0n}\pmod{m_0}\}}.

Raise to the integer power kk, expand the finite sum into ordered tuples (m1,…,mk)∈Dnk(m_1,\ldots,m_k)\in D_n^k, and average with μi/Ti\mu_i/T_i. Each simultaneous system r≡amjn(modmj)r\equiv a_{m_jn}\pmod{m_j} is either inconsistent or specifies exactly one class modulo m=lcm⁡(m1,…,mk)m=\operatorname{lcm}(m_1,\ldots,m_k): two solutions differ by a multiple of every mjm_j, hence of mm, and any one solution generates the whole class. Its mass is therefore at most max⁡b mod mμi(Si∩(b mod m))/Ti\max_{b\bmod m}\mu_i(S_i\cap(b\bmod m))/T_i.

For a fixed m∣Qim\mid Q_i, there are at most ℓk(m)\ell_k(m) such tuples, because DnD_n is a subset of the divisors of QiQ_i and ℓk(m)\ell_k(m) counts all ordered tuples with that least common multiple. Summing this bound over m∣Qim\mid Q_i gives exactly βk(i)k\beta_k(i)^k.

Source precision. Restricting the tuple sum to DnD_n avoids assigning a residue am0na_{m_0n} to a modulus absent from M\mathcal M, which is implicit in the printed sum over all divisors. This proof needs the moduli to be distinct; arbitrary repetitions would add multiplicities.

Bears on. Problem 2.