Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Croot,
published paper,
p. 235, Lemma 2. The factorial estimate compressed in the source is
expanded here, including the endpoint needed in Theorem 1.
In particular this bounds the strict inequality in the printed lemma too.
Complete proof. Set r=⌈cB(x)⌉. For x sufficiently large,
r≥1. An integer with ω(n)≥r contains a set of r distinct
prime divisors. Counting such sets gives
Consequently the logarithm of the factor multiplying x is at most
−rlogr+rlogA(x)+r=−(2c+o(1))T(x).
Indeed, r=(c+o(1))B(x),
logr=21loglogx+O(logloglogx), and
logA(x)=O(logloglogx). Thus rlogr=(c/2+o(1))T(x), while both
remaining terms are o(T(x)).
Source clarification. No estimate that is uniform in a growing c is
used. The weak threshold above also covers the discarded
ω(n)≥B(x) class in Theorem 1, even when B(x) is an integer.