Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Expansion of the cyclic specialization of the corollary on printed p. 378 (Part I PDF p. 3) and the unexpanded transfer in Part II on printed p. 79 (Part II PDF p. 4). This is a complete compilation-supplied deduction from the finite Chinese remainder theorem. Part I only needs product sets with the correct projection cardinalities; the explicit digit reversal below supplies the aligned intervals required by Part II's formulation.

Statement

Let N=∏i=1npisiN=\prod_{i=1}^n p_i^{s_i}, with n≥1n\ge1, distinct primes pip_i, and positive integer exponents sis_i. There is a bijection

Θ:Z/NZ⟶P=∏i{0,…,pisi−1}\Theta:\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z\longrightarrow P=\prod_i\{0,\ldots,p_i^{s_i}-1\}

that sends every congruence class modulo a divisor m=∏ipitim=\prod_i p_i^{t_i} of NN to an aligned box whose ii-th side is an interval of pisi−tip_i^{s_i-t_i} consecutive integers starting at a multiple of pisi−tip_i^{s_i-t_i}. Every such box has a unique inverse image of this form. Its cardinality is N/mN/m.

Consequently this correspondence preserves covers, properness and equality or inequality of cardinalities. Distinct moduli correspond exactly to distinct box cardinalities.

Proof

The finite Chinese remainder theorem gives the bijection

x(modN)⟼(x(modp1s1),…,x(modpnsn)).x\pmod N\longmapsto(x\pmod{p_1^{s_1}},\ldots, x\pmod{p_n^{s_n}}).

In a coordinate with prime pp and exponent ss, write its least nonnegative representative uniquely as x=∑j=0s−1ejpjx=\sum_{j=0}^{s-1}e_jp^j, where 0≤ej<p0\le e_j<p. Define

ρp,s(x)=∑j=0s−1ejps−1−j.\rho_{p,s}(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{s-1}e_jp^{s-1-j}.

This reverses the ss digits, including initial zero digits. Reversing twice returns xx, so it is a bijection. Let Θ\Theta be the Chinese remainder bijection followed by this reversal in each coordinate.

The condition x≡a(modpt)x\equiv a\pmod{p^t} fixes precisely the low digits e0,…,et−1e_0,\ldots,e_{t-1}. Their reversal fixes the high tt digits and leaves the remaining s−ts-t digits arbitrary. If c=∑j=0t−1ejpt−1−jc=\sum_{j=0}^{t-1}e_jp^{t-1-j}, the image is exactly

{cps−t,…,(c+1)ps−t−1}.\{cp^{s-t},\ldots,(c+1)p^{s-t}-1\}.

For t=0t=0 take c=0c=0: the image is the full coordinate. For t=st=s it is a singleton. Applying this in all coordinates proves the forward claim and the size formula ∏ipisi−ti=N/m\prod_i p_i^{s_i-t_i}=N/m.

Conversely, an aligned interval of length ps−tp^{s-t} specifies exactly those high tt digits; reverse them to recover a unique residue modulo ptp^t. For a product of these intervals, the Chinese remainder theorem gives one residue modulo m=∏ipitim=\prod_i p_i^{t_i}. This is the unique inverse image. A finite cyclic group of order NN has one subgroup of each index m∣Nm\mid N, namely mZ/NZm\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z after a generator is chosen, so the residue classes are precisely its cosets.

Finally, a family of integer residue classes with moduli dividing NN covers Z\mathbb Z if and only if their images cover Z/NZ\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z: every membership condition depends only on the residue modulo NN. Bijections preserve unions, the full group corresponds to the full box, and m↦N/mm\mapsto N/m is injective. These facts prove all the stated covering and cardinality consequences.

External input and scope

The only external theorem here is the finite Chinese remainder theorem: for pairwise coprime positive moduli, reduction from the residue ring modulo their product to the product of the residue rings is a bijection. Oddness is unnecessary for this correspondence itself. It enters the subsequent counting obstructions. Arbitrary cosets in noncyclic Sylow groups are not being identified with aligned intervals; the separate nilpotent-group proof uses Part I's broader product-set theorem.

Bears on. The geometric reductions for Problem 7. In the square-free case, all exponents are one, so these boxes become the usual CRT hyperplanes.