Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Theorem 1.5 (manuscript p. 2). For every integer ,
and the bound is uniform in : the implied constant does not depend on .
The authors present it as making uniform an upper bound of Pomerance (Acta Arith. 26 (1975), the paper's [15]). They remark (p. 2) that Corollary 3 of [15] appears to give a uniform upper bound, but that its dependence on is suppressed in the notation.
Source. Paul Pollack, Carl Pomerance, and Lola Thompson, Divisor-Sum Fibers, Mathematika 64(2) (2018), 330--342, DOI 10.1112/S0025579317000535. Theorem 1.5 is on p. 2 of the 11-page author manuscript that the source card identifies.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause against the manuscript. The paper gives only a proof sketch (pp. 9--10), which was read for its structure only, not verified.
Proof pointer
"Proof Sketch of Theorem 1.5", end of Section 4, pp. 9--10. Since , the largest prime factor of , divides , it suffices to bound the with . Standard estimates discard of the , leaving those with , , and no proper power above dividing . Writing with gives , display (4.4). When , the solutions for a given share one value of , and a uniform bound on the number of with is summed over the ranges . When , smooth-number estimates allow with , and congruence (4.5) determines from and . This is a map of the sketch, not a reconstruction of it.
Dependencies
The -analogue of Pomerance's bound on the number of with , uniform in (Mathematika 27 (1980) and the 1989 survey Two methods in elementary analytic number theory, the paper's [16] and [17]); standard estimates for smooth numbers.
Bears on
No problem in the corpus. Section 4, where the theorem is proved, concerns the equation , and no problem page uses this bound.