Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 1). is a real additive function: whenever . The truncation is when and otherwise.
Theorem V (p. 3). Let be additive, and suppose there are constants and infinitely many for each of which there are integers with and for all . Then there is a constant such that, with and its truncation,
The print writes the series as , which converges for every because ; the paper's converse (p. 3), its proof (which ends on p. 14 with ) and its use in Theorems IV and XI all take the form above.
Converse (p. 3). If with , then for every there is a such that for every there are with and .
Definition (p. 3). is finitely distributed when it satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem V.
Proof pointer
The converse is proved first (pp. 8--10), by a second-moment estimate for around : for every there is a with for more than integers . The theorem itself (pp. 10--14) splits into three cases on pairs of prime sequences with and : (Case 1), with (Case 2), and , printed with (Case 3, reduced to Case 2 by subtracting a multiple of ); in each the finitely distributed hypothesis is contradicted, Case 2 following an earlier density lemma of Erdős.
Read depth
Claims checked: the statement, the converse and the definition read on the page image of p. 3; the proof on pp. 8--14 read for structure. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External inputs named by the paper: Turán's method and Lemma 2 of Erdős's 1937 paper on the density of some sequences of numbers.
Source. P. Erdős, On the distribution function of additive functions, Ann. of Math. (2) 47 (1946), 1--20, doi:10.2307/1969031; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 491: the paper says (p. 3) that it deduces from Theorem V the results proved as Theorems XI and XIII, which give for nondecreasing and for with ; the proof of Theorem XI (pp. 17--18) uses Theorem V, while the written proof of Theorem XIII (pp. 18--19) does not. Theorem V itself does not address the problem's bounded-difference hypothesis.