Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Theorem XIII (p. 18). Let ff be a real additive function with f(m+1)−f(m)→0f(m+1)-f(m)\to0 as m→∞m\to\infty. Then f(m)=clog⁡mf(m)=c\log m for a constant cc.

The paper adds (p. 19) that the conclusion seems likely to hold under 1n∑m=1n∣f(m+1)−f(m)∣→0\frac1n\sum_{m=1}^n|f(m+1)-f(m)|\to0.

Proof pointer

Pp. 18--19. With P1<P2<⋯P_1<P_2<\cdots the prime powers and c=lim sup⁡f(Pi)/log⁡Pic=\limsup f(P_i)/\log P_i, the proof treats in turn the cases where infinitely many primes, finitely many but some, and no primes have a power QQ with f(Q)/log⁡Q>cf(Q)/\log Q>c, and then f(Q)/log⁡Q<cf(Q)/\log Q<c for some QQ; in each it constructs pairs of integers a bounded distance apart whose ff-values differ by more than a fixed δ>0\delta>0, contradicting f(m+1)−f(m)→0f(m+1)-f(m)\to0. On p. 3 the paper says it deduces this result from Theorem V; the written argument on pp. 18--19 does not invoke it.

Read depth

Claims checked: the statement and its proof on pp. 18--19 read on the page images for structure. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

None in the corpus.

Source. P. Erdős, On the distribution function of additive functions, Ann. of Math. (2) 47 (1946), 1--20, doi:10.2307/1969031; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 491: the theorem gives f(n)=clog⁡nf(n)=c\log n, the problem's conclusion with error term 0, for additive ff with f(n+1)−f(n)→0f(n+1)-f(n)\to0, a hypothesis that implies the problem's bounded differences.
  • Problem 1122: related only: the theorem's hypothesis f(n+1)−f(n)→0f(n+1)-f(n)\to0 differs from the problem's and does not imply it, since f(n)=−log⁡nf(n)=-\log n satisfies it and decreases at every nn.