Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Quoted (p. 112): "Finally I shall deal with the following problem of Erdös, Herzog and Piranian [2, Problem 13]. Let be complex numbers which satisfy (). Is maximal if the are the vertices of a regular -gon of diameter 2? We denote the maximum by :
The conjecture implies that for even and for odd . The last quantity is ."
Theorem 15 (p. 113). "Let be a convex continuum of capacity 1. Then, for (), ."
Theorem 16 (p. 114). "If is defined by (10), then ."
Remark (pp. 114--115, quoted in part): "We can make the following observation in favor of the conjecture of Erdös, Herzog and Piranian about . The convex hull of a maximal system [sic] is nearly a disk, for large ."
The product in (10) is Problem 1045's and the of Danzer and Pommerenke (1967); the even- value the conjecture implies was refuted there for every even (card), and this paper proves nothing about the regular polygon.
Source. Ch. Pommerenke, On metric properties of complex polynomials, Michigan Math. J. 8 (1961), no. 2, 97--115; the problem and display (10) on printed p. 112, Lemma 6 on pp. 112--113, Theorem 15 on p. 113 with its proof on pp. 113--114, Theorem 16 with its proof and the remark on pp. 114--115 (PDF pp. 16--19 of the publisher's scan), read on the page images (the scan has no text layer). The copy read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the problem as recalled, display (10), Lemma 6, Theorems 15 and 16 and the remark were read clause by clause on the page images on 2026-09-22; the proofs of Theorems 15 and 16 and of the remark (half a page together) were read in full and followed, Lemma 6 and Szegő's determinant inequality being taken as printed. The proof of Lemma 6 (p. 113) was read for structure and not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Lemma 6 (pp. 112--113): for a convex continuum of capacity 1 there are monic polynomials , , with zeros in and ; the zeros are for the exterior map of , and for fixed the function is starlike and univalent in (convexity of makes each factor starlike about ), so is univalent and nonvanishing in , , and .
Theorem 15 (pp. 113--114): is the squared modulus of the Vandermonde determinant , which equals for any monic of degree (); Hadamard's determinant inequality gives (an inequality the paper attributes to Szegő, citing footnote 7 on p. 236 of its [3]), and Lemma 6 bounds each factor by , giving .
Theorem 16 (p. 114): for a maximal system with convex hull , Theorem 15 applied after scaling to capacity 1 gives , and gives . Remark (pp. 114--115): if the hulls were not nearly disks, a subsequence would converge to a convex of diameter at most 2 that is not a disk, so and , and (12) would give for large , which contradicts .
Dependencies
Within the paper: Lemma 6. Outside it: Szegő's form of Hadamard's determinant inequality (Fekete, Math. Z. 17 (1923), 228--249, footnote 7 on p. 236, the paper's [3]; not held), the bound for a univalent nonvanishing in , and .
Bears on
- Problem 1045: the first general upper bound on the problem's maximum, exponentially above the conjectured scale, later replaced by the of Danzer and Pommerenke (1967); the remark shows the convex hull of a maximal system is nearly a disk for large . The paper decides nothing about the regular polygon, and its record of the conjecture's even value is the statement the 1967 paper refutes.