Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

f(z)=∏ν=1n(z−zν)f(z)=\prod_{\nu=1}^n(z-z_\nu) and E={∣f(z)∣≤1}E=\{|f(z)|\le1\} (p. 97).

Theorem 10 (pp. 106--107). "Let z0=1n∑ν=1nzν=0z_0=\frac1n\sum_{\nu=1}^nz_\nu=0 and σ2=1n∑ν=1n∣zν∣2\sigma^2=\frac1n\sum_{\nu=1}^n|z_\nu|^2. Then the following best possible results hold:

(a) If ∣zν∣≤2/2|z_\nu|\le\sqrt2/2 or if zν∈[−1,+1]z_\nu\in[-1,+1], then EE is connected.

(b) If EE is connected, then ∣zν∣<2|z_\nu|<2 and σ<2\sigma<\sqrt2."

Inside the proof of (b) the paper states the containment the problem pages use (p. 107): with z0=0z_0=0 and EE connected, "Hence EE is contained in ∣z∣≤2|z|\le2 (see for instance [6, p. 42]), and it follows that ∣zν∣<2|z_\nu|<2 because zνz_\nu is an interior point of EE." Since a translation of the zeros translates EE, a connected lemniscate set lies in the closed disk of radius 2 about the centroid of the zeros. This containment answers Problem 14 of the 1958 paper (whether the lemniscate set of a KK-polynomial lies in a disk of radius 2 centered at the centroid) affirmatively; the paper does not name Problem 14 here, and the author had already answered it as Theorem 3 (p. 222) of his 1959 note [9], pommerenke_1959_some_problems_erdos_herzog_piranian.

Sharpness (pp. 107--108): (z2−1/2)m(z2+a2)(z^2-1/2)^m(z^2+a^2) with a>2/2a>\sqrt2/2 has three components for large mm, and z2−a2z^2-a^2 with a>1a>1 has two; the Chebyshev polynomial Tn(21/n−1z)=zn+⋯T_n(2^{1/n-1}z)=z^n+\cdots has a connected EE with a zero 21−1/ncos⁡(π/2n)→22^{1-1/n}\cos(\pi/2n)\to2 and σ2=22−2/n⋅1n∑cos⁡2π2n(2ν−1)→2\sigma^2=2^{2-2/n}\cdot\frac1n\sum\cos^2\frac\pi{2n}(2\nu-1)\to2.

Source. Ch. Pommerenke, On metric properties of complex polynomials, Michigan Math. J. 8 (1961), no. 2, 97--115; Theorem 10 on printed pp. 106--107 (PDF pp. 10--11 of the publisher's scan), its proof on pp. 107--108 (PDF pp. 11--12), Lemma 4 on pp. 105--106 (PDF pp. 9--10), read on the page images (the scan has no text layer). The copy read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the containment sentence and the sharpness examples were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof of (a) (a paragraph) was followed; the proof of (b) and Lemma 4 were read for structure and not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

(a) (p. 107): for ∣zν∣≤2/2|z_\nu|\le\sqrt2/2, Lemma 1 (pp. 98--99) with z0=0z_0=0 and σ2≤1/2\sigma^2\le1/2 puts the disk ∣z∣≤2/2|z|\le\sqrt2/2 in EE, and Lemma 2 (p. 99) makes EE connected; for zν∈[−1,1]z_\nu\in[-1,1], both halves [−1,0][-1,0] and [0,1][0,1] lie in EE by [2, Theorem 1], and Lemma 2 applies again.

(b) (p. 107): with z0=0z_0=0, w=f(z)1/n=z+a2∗z−1+⋯w=f(z)^{1/n}=z+a_2^*z^{-1}+\cdots (6) is univalent in the exterior {∣f∣>1}\{|f|>1\} of the connected EE, so its inverse z=ϕ(w)=w+∑μ≥1bμw−μz=\phi(w)=w+\sum_{\mu\ge1}b_\mu w^{-\mu} (7) is meromorphic and univalent in ∣w∣>1|w|>1; the Koebe-type bound for such functions gives E⊂{∣z∣≤2}E\subset\{|z|\le2\} (Golusin [6, p. 42]) and ∣zν∣<2|z_\nu|<2. From (5), the integral of Lemma 4 evaluates to λ(r)/n=r2+∑∣bμ∣2r−2μ\lambda(r)/n=r^2+\sum|b_\mu|^2r^{-2\mu} for r>1r>1, so Lemma 4 gives σ2<λ(1)/n=1+∑∣bμ∣2\sigma^2<\lambda(1)/n=1+\sum|b_\mu|^2, and the area theorem ∑μ∣bμ∣2≤1\sum\mu|b_\mu|^2\le1 (Golusin [6, p. 39]) gives σ2<2\sigma^2<2.

Dependencies

Within the paper: Lemmas 1, 2 and 4. Outside it: Theorem 1 of the 1958 paper for the interval case (erdos_1958_metric_properties_polynomials), and for (b) the distortion bound and the area theorem for univalent functions in ∣w∣>1|w|>1 from Golusin, Geometrische Funktionentheorie (1957), pp. 42 and 39 (not held).

Bears on

  • Problem 509: the connected case. When {∣f∣≤1}\{|f|\le1\} is connected it lies in one disk of radius 2 centered at the centroid of the zeros (p. 107), so a single circle of radius 2 covers it; the paper states nothing about the disconnected case, which is the problem's open content. The card of Hong 2026 recalls this connected case.
  • Problem 1038: context only. For real zeros in [−1,1][-1,1] with centroid 00, (a) records that [−1,1]⊂E[-1,1]\subset E by [2, Theorem 1]; the paper adds no bound on the measure of E∩RE\cap\mathbb R for that class.