Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

f(z)=∏ν=1n(z−zν)f(z)=\prod_{\nu=1}^n(z-z_\nu) and E={∣f(z)∣≤1}E=\{|f(z)|\le1\} (p. 97). Quoted (p. 98): "Let the zeros zνz_\nu of f(z)f(z) belong to the disk ∣z∣≤r|z|\le r. Erdös, Herzog and Piranian [2, Problem 7] raised the question whether there is always a component of EE with diameter at least 2−r2-r (r<2r<2). The answer is negative for r>1r>1. To show this, let f(z)=zn−rnf(z)=z^n-r^n (r>1r>1). Then the set E={∣zn−rn∣≤1}E=\{|z^n-r^n|\le1\} has nn components."

The passage concludes, after the estimate recorded below: "Hence the (common) diameter of the components of EE tends to 00 as n→∞n\to\infty." For any fixed rr with 1<r<21<r<2 and nn large, no component of EE has diameter at least 2−r>02-r>0. The case 0<r≤10<r\le1 is answered affirmatively by Theorem 3 (p. 99).

Source. Ch. Pommerenke, On metric properties of complex polynomials, Michigan Math. J. 8 (1961), no. 2, 97--115; the unnumbered passage on printed p. 98 (PDF p. 2 of the publisher's scan), read on the page image (the scan has no text layer). The copy read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the passage was read clause by clause on the page image on 2026-09-22, and its estimate (three lines) was read in full and followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Page 98. The zeros of zn−rnz^n-r^n are the nn points rζr\zeta, ζn=1\zeta^n=1, and each component of EE contains a zero. For zz in the component containing the zero rr, write zn−rn=ωz^n-r^n=\omega with ∣ω∣≤1|\omega|\le1; then, as printed,

∣z−r∣=∣(rn+ω)1/n−r∣=r ∣1+ωn−1r−n+O(n−2r−n)+⋯−1∣≤n−1r−n+1(1+O(n−1))→0.|z-r|=\bigl|(r^n+\omega)^{1/n}-r\bigr| =r\,\bigl|1+\omega n^{-1}r^{-n}+O(n^{-2}r^{-n})+\cdots-1\bigr| \le n^{-1}r^{-n+1}\bigl(1+O(n^{-1})\bigr)\to0 .

By symmetry the same holds at every zero, so the nn components are distinct for large nn and their common diameter tends to 00. The paper does not spell out why EE has exactly nn components for every nn; the estimate shows the components are eventually disjoint.

A filing observation, not a review verdict: Problem 1048 is posed for the open set {∣f∣<1}\{|f|<1\} and asks for a component of diameter strictly above 2−r2-r; every component of the open set lies in a component of EE, so the example refutes that form too.

Dependencies

None beyond the binomial expansion of (rn+ω)1/n(r^n+\omega)^{1/n}.

Bears on

  • Problem 1048: the negative answer for 1<r<21<r<2, the range the site's DISPROVED (LEAN) label rests on; Theorem 3 answers the range 0<r≤10<r\le1 affirmatively for the closed set EE; for the problem's open set and strict inequality this carries over for 0<r≤1/20<r\le1/2 (the argument is on the claim page), the theorem does not decide 1/2<r≤11/2<r\le1, and the degenerate case r=0r=0 fails (znz^n gives the open unit disc, of diameter exactly 22).