Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (pp. 39--41). For an entire function with listed increasingly, has Fabry gaps if (p. 39). The deficiency is , with the characteristic function (pp. 40--41).
Construction (Section 5, heading p. 52). There is an entire function with Fabry gaps such that (stated pp. 52 and 55). The section is unnumbered as a result; its heading reads "An entire function with Fabry gaps such that " and it concludes that "the assertion of our theorem does not hold with Fejér gaps replaced by Fabry gaps" (p. 55).
The section proves only the deficiency statement. It bounds the zeros of in growing disks, for (p. 55), and does not show that is taken only finitely often.
Source. Section 5, pp. 52--55, of Takafumi Murai, The deficiency of entire functions with Fejér gaps, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 33 (1983), no. 3, 39--58, doi:10.5802/aif.930, as identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the definitions it uses were read on the printed pages. The construction (pp. 52--55) was read for its mechanism and not checked step by step; nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Section 5 (pp. 52--55). The model is , which omits and has exponents . Write for the Taylor polynomial of of degree . Starting from , , , , the paper chooses inductively a degree and sets , close to on a disk with the same zeros there (28)--(30); then a large integer and , with (31) and large on many short arcs of every circle (33) (p. 53). The limit is entire (p. 54). Its exponents up to are those of , namely the numbers with and and the multiples with (34), which gives for and hence Fabry gaps (pp. 54--55). Rouché's theorem gives (35), while the arcs of (33) give for (36)--(37); so (p. 55).
Dependencies
Rouché's theorem; nothing else from the paper.
Bears on
- Problem 517: no direct bearing. A function with Fabry gaps satisfies the problem's hypothesis , but deficiency at does not mean that is taken finitely often, and the paper does not show that it is; so the example neither answers the problem nor is a counterexample to it. It shows only that the Theorem cannot be extended to Fabry gaps.