Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Conventions (pp. 205, 207). T=[−π,π)\mathbf T=[-\pi,\pi) carries the normalized measure dμ=dx/2πd\mu=dx/2\pi, ∫\int is taken with respect to it, and ∥f∥1=∫∣f(x)∣\|f\|_1=\int|f(x)|. The frequencies n1,…,nNn_1,\ldots,n_N are distinct integers, Z+\mathbf Z_+ is the set of nonnegative integers and N\mathbf N the set of positive integers, Sp⁡(f)\operatorname{Sp}(f) is the set of n∈Zn\in\mathbf Z with f^(n)≠0\hat f(n)\ne0, and CC is a positive constant, not necessarily the same at each occurrence. For F∈L(T)F\in L(\mathbf T) and r∈Z+r\in\mathbf Z_+, X=XF,rX=X_{F,r} is the subspace of L(T)L(\mathbf T) spanned by the functions exp⁡(i(n+2ru)x)\exp(i(n+2^ru)x) with n∈Sp⁡(F)n\in\operatorname{Sp}(F) and u∈Nu\in\mathbf N, and (5)

IF,r=inf⁡Fr∈X∥F−Fr∥1.I_{F,r}=\inf_{F_r\in X}\|F-F_r\|_1 .

Since XF,0⊃XF,1⊃⋯X_{F,0}\supset X_{F,1}\supset\cdots, the quantities IF,rI_{F,r} are nondecreasing in rr (p. 207).

Theorem (p. 207). Let F(x)=∑j=1Najexp⁡(injx)F(x)=\sum_{j=1}^Na_j\exp(in_jx) with aj∈Ca_j\in\mathbf C and ∣aj∣≥1|a_j|\ge1 for j=1,…,Nj=1,\ldots,N (6), and let RR be a positive integer such that 2R∤(nj−nl)2^R\nmid(n_j-n_l) for 1≤j<l≤N1\le j<l\le N (7). Then (8)

IF,R≥Cln⁡N,I_{F,R}\ge C\ln N,

where C>0C>0 is an absolute constant.

Since ∥F∥1≥IF,R\|F\|_1\ge I_{F,R}, the paper records (p. 207) that the theorem contains the inequality ∥F∥1≥Cln⁡N\|F\|_1\ge C\ln N. For distinct frequencies some RR satisfying (7) always exists, so this lower bound holds for every such FF; with all aj=1a_j=1 it is Littlewood's conjecture, stated in the paper as Corollary 2.

Proof pointer

Pp. 207--223. The proof works with the dyadic averages frf_r of ff, whose Fourier series keep the frequencies divisible by 2r2^r, and their differences f~r=fr−fr+1\tilde f_r=f_r-f_{r+1}, which keep those divisible by 2r2^r but not by 2r+12^{r+1} ((10), (11), p. 207); both have L1L^1 norm at most ∥f∥1\|f\|_1 ((9), p. 207). The printed definition of frf_r omits the factor 2−r2^{-r} that the formula for f~r\tilde f_r and (9)--(11) require. Lemma 1 (p. 208) is a duality lower bound for ∥f∥1\|f\|_1 in terms of If,rI_{f,r} and a bounded test function supported on frequencies divisible by 2r2^r; with it Lemma 3 (p. 211) gives IF,R≥#(AΓ)1/3/5I_{F,R}\ge\#(A_\Gamma)^{1/3}/5, where AΓA_\Gamma is the set of r∈Z+r\in\mathbf Z_+ such that some njn_j is divisible by 2r2^r but not by 2r+12^{r+1} (p. 208), and Lemma 4 (p. 212) gives IF,R≥ln⁡N/(8ln⁡ln⁡N)I_{F,R}\ge\ln N/(8\ln\ln N) for N≥4N\ge4. Lemma 5 (pp. 213--214), which the paper calls a generalization and refinement of Lemma 5 of Pichorides (its reference [15], p. 208), is the second recursion inequality. Section 5 (pp. 218--223) proves by induction on NN the stronger bound IF,R≥Cln⁡N+ln⁡N/(10ln⁡ln⁡N)I_{F,R}\ge C\ln N+\ln N/(10\ln\ln N) (62): Lemma 8 (p. 218) splits into the case that many dyadic levels are occupied, handled by Lemma 3, and the case of a chain of levels r0<⋯<r2nr_0<\cdots<r_{2n} each carrying many frequencies, handled by the induction hypothesis and the recursion inequalities.

Read depth

Claims checked: the conventions, the definition (5) and the theorem were read clause by clause on the page images of the English translation; the structure of the proof was followed but its estimates were not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. The paper cites a duality theorem (its reference [16], p. 142), facts on Hardy spaces from Zygmund's Trigonometric series and a lemma of Pichorides (its reference [15]).

Source. S. V. Konyagin, On the Littlewood problem, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 45 (1981), no. 2, 243--265, 463; English translation, On a problem of Littlewood, Math. USSR Izvestija 18 (1982), no. 2, 205--225, whose pages are cited here; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 512: the inequality ∥F∥1≥Cln⁡N\|F\|_1\ge C\ln N that the theorem contains, taken with all aj=1a_j=1, is the problem's inequality for a set of NN integers: with the normalized measure, ∥F∥1\|F\|_1 equals the problem's integral after the change of variable x=2πθx=2\pi\theta.