Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 1, p. 712, proof p. 712, of R. D. Anderson and J. E. Keisler, An example in dimension theory, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), no. 4, 709--713, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-1967-0215288-0, the edition named on the source card.
Statement
Setting (p. 709). is the set of positive integers, is Euclidean -space, is the (inductive) topological dimension of Hurewicz and Wallman, and is the product of copies of .
Theorem 1 (p. 712, quoted). "Let , . There exists such that ."
Here the set may depend on both and ; the paper's Theorem 2 removes the dependence on and adds the countable power.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the setting were read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 709 and 712. The proof was read in outline only; its steps and Lemmas 1--3 were not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Page 712, written here in outline. Lemma 3 (p. 711) supplies countably many -spheres in such that any missing all of them has . The proof well-orders the nondegenerate continua of so that each has fewer than predecessors and builds by transfinite induction: whenever a continuum does not yet meet the set built so far, one of its points is added, chosen so that no -letter word over the enlarged set lies on any . This is possible because each continuum has $\mathfrak c$ points while fewer than of them are excluded. Then misses every , so and hence ; and meets every nondegenerate continuum, so Lemma 1 (p. 710) gives , and therefore .
Dependencies
Lemmas 1 and 3 of the same paper (pp. 710--711), and Lemma 2 (pp. 710--711), which the paper uses in a weakened form "without explicit proof here" (p. 710).
Bears on
- Problem 909: the problem asks, for , for a space of dimension with also of dimension . Theorem 1 with , applied in , gives a set with , for every , with the inductive dimension of Hurewicz and Wallman. The paper does not mention the problem.