Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 1, p. 712, proof p. 712, of R. D. Anderson and J. E. Keisler, An example in dimension theory, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), no. 4, 709--713, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-1967-0215288-0, the edition named on the source card.

Statement

Setting (p. 709). ω\omega is the set of positive integers, EnE^n is Euclidean nn-space, dim⁡\dim is the (inductive) topological dimension of Hurewicz and Wallman, and KsK^s is the product of ss copies of KK.

Theorem 1 (p. 712, quoted). "Let nn, s∈ωs\in\omega. There exists K⊂EnK\subset E^n such that dim⁡K=dim⁡Ks=n−1\dim K=\dim K^s=n-1."

Here the set may depend on both nn and ss; the paper's Theorem 2 removes the dependence on ss and adds the countable power.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the setting were read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 709 and 712. The proof was read in outline only; its steps and Lemmas 1--3 were not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Page 712, written here in outline. Lemma 3 (p. 711) supplies countably many (ns−n)(ns-n)-spheres SiS_i in Ens=(En)sE^{ns}=(E^n)^s such that any T⊂EnsT\subset E^{ns} missing all of them has dim⁡T≤n−1\dim T\le n-1. The proof well-orders the nondegenerate continua of EnE^n so that each has fewer than c\mathfrak c predecessors and builds KK by transfinite induction: whenever a continuum does not yet meet the set built so far, one of its points is added, chosen so that no ss-letter word over the enlarged set lies on any SiS_i. This is possible because each continuum has $\mathfrak c$ points while fewer than c\mathfrak c of them are excluded. Then KsK^s misses every SiS_i, so dim⁡Ks≤n−1\dim K^s\le n-1 and hence dim⁡K≤n−1\dim K\le n-1; and KK meets every nondegenerate continuum, so Lemma 1 (p. 710) gives dim⁡K≥n−1\dim K\ge n-1, and therefore dim⁡Ks≥n−1\dim K^s\ge n-1.

Dependencies

Lemmas 1 and 3 of the same paper (pp. 710--711), and Lemma 2 (pp. 710--711), which the paper uses in a weakened form "without explicit proof here" (p. 710).

Bears on

  • Problem 909: the problem asks, for n≥2n\ge2, for a space SS of dimension nn with S2S^2 also of dimension nn. Theorem 1 with s=2s=2, applied in En+1E^{n+1}, gives a set K⊂En+1K\subset E^{n+1} with dim⁡K=dim⁡K2=n\dim K=\dim K^2=n, for every n≥1n\ge1, with dim⁡\dim the inductive dimension of Hurewicz and Wallman. The paper does not mention the problem.