Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation (printed p. 4): is the largest integer such that all of are sums of two elements of some system of non-negative integers (the zero counted); the least with is the size of a minimal 2-basis for .
Conjecture (printed p. 9, unlabeled, quoted with its lead-in): "Die Verbesserung, die die Basis (11) im Vergleich zur Basis (6) bringt, erstreckt sich nur auf das in lineare Glied von (9). Es ist zu vermuten, daß
ist."
It closes § 1 after the two constructions: (9) $n_2(k)\ge\frac{k^2}4+ \frac32k-\gamma$ from the basis (6) of Satz 2, and (15)--(16) from the basis (11) of Satz 4, which improve only the linear term (p. 8). The counting bound (2) gives , so the conjecture asserts that the constant of the constructions, not the of the count, is the truth.
In the problem's notation. Since , the conjecture is . Erdős 1973 reports it as "Rohrbach conjectured " (printed p. 131 of Erdős 1973, as printed there), and the site's Problem 791 asks its asymptotic form, "is it true that ?". Each of the three forms implies , and each is refuted by Mrose's equation (3), (his counting positive elements, which changes no ratio), so that and ; Kohonen 2017 raises the to .
Source. H. Rohrbach, Ein Beitrag zur additiven Zahlentheorie, Math. Z. 42 (1937), 1--30, doi:10.1007/BF01160061; the conjecture on printed p. 9 = PDF p. 9, the definition of on printed p. 4 = PDF p. 4 of the publisher's scan, read on the page images. The artifact is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the sentence and its lead-in, and the definition of , were read clause by clause on the page images. A conjecture carries no proof; the constructions that motivated it are recorded on satz_3. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
None; a conjecture. The paper's evidence for it is that the second construction (11) improved only the linear term of (9) (pp. 8--9).
Dependencies
None.
Bears on
- Problem 791: the origin of the "in particular" question , in its original and stronger form ; answered in the negative by Mrose 1979, as the problem page records.