Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For a finite sequence A={a1,…,an}A=\{a_1,\ldots,a_n\} of positive integers the cc-sums are the sums ∑u≤i≤vai\sum_{u\le i\le v}a_i over 1≤u≤v≤n1\le u\le v\le n (p. 193). The paper's question, quoted from the introduction (p. 193): "In [1] Erdős and Harzheim asked that if 1≤a1,a2,…,ak≤n1\le a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_k\le n, can we find cncn aia_i's so that all cc-sums are different? (They conjectured that this is not true if a1<a2<a…<aka_1<a_2<a\ldots<a_k [sic] is also assumed.)"

Theorem 1. "Let k=f(n)k=f(n) be the maximum number of integers so that 1≤a1,a2,…,ak≤n1\le a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_k\le n and all cc-sums are different. Then

(13+o(1))n≤f(n)≤(23+o(1))n."\Bigl(\frac13+o(1)\Bigr)n\le f(n)\le\Bigl(\frac23+o(1)\Bigr)n."

As printed on p. 193, opening § 1. The sequence is not required to be increasing; since single terms are cc-sums, its terms are distinct (an observation made here). The f(n)f(n) of this theorem is the kmax⁡(n)k_{\max}(n) of Konieczny's Section 1.5 and bounds the increasing-sequence function of Problem 357 from above.

Source. N. Hegyvári, On consecutive sums in sequences, Acta Math. Hung. 48 (1--2) (1986), 193--200; Theorem 1 on printed p. 193 (PDF p. 1 of the publisher scan), its proof on pp. 193--194 (PDF pp. 1--2) and the Remark on p. 195 (PDF p. 3), read on the page images. The edition is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the introduction's definitions and question were read clause by clause on the page image. The proof (about a page) was read in full on the page images and followed for structure; the Sidon property of the construction is taken from the paper's citation of Halberstam and Roth (p. 90) and no step was checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 193--194. Lower bound: with si=a1+⋯+ais_i=a_1+\cdots+a_i, the cc-sums are the differences sv−su−1s_v-s_{u-1}, so "all cc-sums are different" means that {si}\{s_i\} is a Sidon sequence with si+1−si≤ns_{i+1}-s_i\le n. Take a prime pp with (1−ε)n3≤p≤n3(1-\varepsilon)\frac n3\le p\le\frac n3 (display (1.2)) and set ai+1=2p+[(i+1)2]p−[i2]pa_{i+1}=2p+[(i+1)^2]_p-[i^2]_p for i=0,1,…,p−1i=0,1,\ldots,p-1 (display (1.3)), where [i2]p≡i2(modp)[i^2]_p\equiv i^2\pmod p and 0≤[i2]p≤p−10\le[i^2]_p\le p-1. Then ai+1<3p≤na_{i+1}<3p\le n and si=2pi+[i2]ps_i=2pi+[i^2]_p, "well-known" to be a Sidon sequence (Halberstam and Roth, Sequences, p. 90), which gives $k=p\ge (1-\varepsilon)n/3$ terms. Upper bound: for a fixed large tt, sum all cc-sums bu,r=∑u+1u+raib_{u,r}=\sum_{u+1}^{u+r}a_i of at most tt terms (display (1.4)). Each aia_i occurs in at most (t+12)\binom{t+1}2 of them, so the total is at most (t+12)∑ai≤(t+1)22⋅k(2n−k+1)2\binom{t+1}2\sum a_i\le\frac{(t+1)^2}2\cdot\frac{k(2n-k+1)}2 (display (1.5)); the kt−(t+12)kt-\binom{t+1}2 values are distinct positive integers, so the total exceeds (kt−(t+12)−1)22\frac{(kt-\binom{t+1}2-1)^2}2, which is more than k2t2(1−ε)2\frac{k^2t^2(1-\varepsilon)}2 for large nn (displays (1.6) and (1.7)). Comparing gives k<(1+ε′)23nk<(1+\varepsilon')\frac23n. The Remark (p. 195) credits Erdős with a second derivation of the upper bound, by the Erdős--Turán argument for Sidon sets in an interval (Halberstam and Roth, p. 86).

Dependencies

Outside the paper: the Sidon property of {2pi+[i2]p}\{2pi+[i^2]_p\} and the Erdős--Turán bound on finite Sidon sequences, both cited to Halberstam and Roth, Sequences, Vol. 1 (Clarendon Press, 1966), pp. 90 and 86; not held. Within the paper: nothing.

Bears on

  • Problem 34: the construction the site's commentary credits with the first counterexample. The theorem gives (13+o(1))n(\frac13+o(1))n distinct integers in [1,n][1,n] with all cc-sums distinct; that they extend to a permutation of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} with at least (k+12)≥(118+o(1))n2\binom{k+1}2\ge(\frac1{18}+o(1))n^2 distinct consecutive sums is Konieczny's deduction (Section 1.5 of konieczny_2015_consecutive_sums_permutations, display (10)) and the site's, not a statement of this paper.
  • Problem 357: that problem's increasing sequences are among the sequences of Theorem 1, so its f(n)f(n) is at most (23+o(1))n(\frac23+o(1))n; the lower bound's sequence is not increasing and gives the problem nothing. The introduction records the monotone conjecture that is the problem's question and the paper leaves it open.