Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (Introduction, p. 71). For a positive integer nn, let E={A,B}E=\{A,B\} be a partition of Z2n={1,2,…,2n}Z_{2n}=\{1,2,\ldots,2n\} into two classes A={ai}A=\{a_i\} and B=Z2n∖AB=Z_{2n}\setminus A with nn elements each. For an integer kk between −2n-2n and 2n2n, MkM_k is the number of solutions of ai−bj=ka_i-b_j=k, that is Mk=#((A−k)∩B)M_k=\#((A-k)\cap B). Then M(n,E)=max⁡kMkM(n,E)=\max_kM_k and M(n)=min⁡EM(n,E)M(n)=\min_EM(n,E).

Lemma (p. 71, unnumbered, quoted). "If there is one value n0n_0 of nn such that M(n0)⩽tn0M(n_0)\leqslant tn_0, then lim sup⁡M(i)/i⩽t\limsup M(i)/i\leqslant t."

The limsup is taken as i→∞i\to\infty over the positive integers.

Source. Jan Kristian Haugland, Advances in the Minimum Overlap Problem, Journal of Number Theory 58 (1996), no. 1, 71-78, doi:10.1006/jnth.1996.0064: the lemma in the section "Some Preliminary Results", stated on p. 71 and proved on p. 72. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the setting and the statement were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The short proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Page 72. Blowing up an optimal partition for n0n_0 by replacing each element kk of AA by the block {s(k−1)+1,…,s(k−1)+s}\{s(k-1)+1,\ldots,s(k-1)+s\} gives a partition for sn0sn_0 whose largest overlap is sM(n0)sM(n_0), so M(sn0)⩽sn0tM(sn_0)\leqslant sn_0t for every positive integer ss. Adding 2n+12n+1 to AA and 2n+22n+2 to BB shows M(n+1)⩽M(n)+1M(n+1)\leqslant M(n)+1, which controls MM between consecutive multiples of n0n_0.

Dependencies

None beyond the definitions.

Bears on

  • Problem 36: the problem's minimum overlap count for {1,…,2N}\{1,\ldots,2N\} is the paper's M(N)M(N). The lemma turns one partition with a small maximal overlap into an upper bound on lim sup⁡M(N)/N\limsup M(N)/N, and so on the problem's optimal constant cc; it gives no lower bound for cc.