Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Use the parameters and positive coefficients from [[additive_combinatorics/adamczewski_2026_erdos1/normal_coefficients|the normal-coefficient construction]], so and
For every labeled pair
form the positive integer
Distinct elements and subset sums
First the labeled weights in (2) are pairwise distinct. If , use the two digit vectors having respectively the single nonzero digits in coordinate and in coordinate . Both digits are smaller than . Their images under the map of [[additive_combinatorics/adamczewski_2026_erdos1/digit_injectivity|digit injectivity]] agree, so the digit vectors agree. Hence and .
We may therefore define the set
and its cardinality is exactly
A subset of chooses bits . For each let
so , and the subset sum is . Different subsets give different bit arrays because the labeled weights are distinct; uniqueness of binary expansion makes their digit vectors different. Digit injectivity then makes their subset sums different. Thus is sum-distinct.
Range and ratio
From (1), every element of is at most
Set
Then , and (3)–(4) give the exact cancellation
The lattice reduction supplied , so (5) yields
Source and dependencies
An explanation of the proof of Erdős Problem 1, preliminary exposition with no named author (erdosproblems.com, 2026), §7, equations (26)–(28), pp. 8–9. The edition read is named on the source card. The proof establishes pairwise distinctness of the labeled weights before treating them as a set; this is needed for the cardinality and subset encoding in (3).
Bears on. #1.