Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (pp. 1, 2 and 4). For a positive integer mm and an integer aa with gcd⁡(a,m)=1\gcd(a,m)=1, Ha,m\mathcal H_{a,m} is the set of integer points (x,y)(x,y) with xy≡a(modm)xy\equiv a\pmod m, and for sets of integers X,Y\mathcal X,\mathcal Y, Ha,m(X,Y)\mathcal H_{a,m}(\mathcal X,\mathcal Y) is the set of its points with x∈Xx\in\mathcal X and y∈Yy\in\mathcal Y. φ\varphi is Euler's function. By the paper's notation (p. 4), implied constants are absolute unless they obviously depend on ε\varepsilon.

Theorem 13 (p. 13). Let X={U+1,…,U+X}\mathcal X=\{U+1,\ldots,U+X\}, where m>X≥1m>X\ge1 and U≥0U\ge0 are integers. Suppose that for each x∈Xx\in\mathcal X a set Yx={Vx+1,…,Vx+Y}\mathcal Y_x=\{V_x+1,\ldots,V_x+Y\} is given, where m>Y≥1m>Y\ge1 and Vx≥0V_x\ge0 are integers. Then for every integer m≥1m\ge1 and every aa with gcd⁡(a,m)=1\gcd(a,m)=1,

#{(x,y)∈Ha,m: x∈X, y∈Yx}=φ(m)m2XY+O ⁣(m1/2+o(1)).\#\{(x,y)\in\mathcal H_{a,m}:\ x\in\mathcal X,\ y\in\mathcal Y_x\} =\frac{\varphi(m)}{m^2}XY+O\!\left(m^{1/2+o(1)}\right).

Formula (10) (p. 14). Taking Vx=VV_x=V for every x∈Xx\in\mathcal X and Y={V+1,…,V+Y}\mathcal Y=\{V+1,\ldots,V+Y\}, the theorem gives the box count

#Ha,m(X,Y)=φ(m)m2XY+O ⁣(m1/2+o(1)).(10)\#\mathcal H_{a,m}(\mathcal X,\mathcal Y) =\frac{\varphi(m)}{m^2}XY+O\!\left(m^{1/2+o(1)}\right). \tag{10}

Stated limitation (p. 14). The survey says that improving Theorem 13, or even just (10), so as to make them nontrivial for XY<mαXY<m^\alpha with some fixed α<3/2\alpha<3/2 seems out of reach at present, and relates this exponent to the range m≤X2/3−εm\le X^{2/3-\varepsilon} in which an asymptotic formula for the sum of τ(n)\tau(n) over n≤Xn\le X with n≡a(modm)n\equiv a\pmod m is known.

The paper calls the estimate a slight generalisation of several known results and says it has appeared in various forms (p. 13); it gives the short proof to show the method. The theorem holds for composite as well as prime mm, and nothing in it requires XX and YY to be comparable.

Source. Igor E. Shparlinski, Modular hyperbolas, Japanese Journal of Mathematics 7 (2012), 235--294, doi:10.1007/s11537-012-1140-8, read in arXiv:1103.2879v4 as identified on the source card; labels and pages are that preprint's: the notation on pp. 1, 2 and 4, Theorem 13 and its proof on pp. 13--14, formula (10) and the limitation remark on p. 14.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, formula (10) and the limitation remark were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 13--14. The indicator of the two congruence conditions is written with additive characters through the orthogonality identity (3) (p. 5), which turns the count into an average over (r,s)(r,s) modulo mm of Kloosterman sums Km(r,as)K_m(r,as) times incomplete exponential sums over X\mathcal X and over the Yx\mathcal Y_x. The term r=s=0r=s=0 gives the main term φ(m)XY/m2\varphi(m)XY/m^2. The remaining terms are grouped by d=gcd⁡(r,s,m)d=\gcd(r,s,m) and bounded with the Kloosterman bound (1) (p. 3) and the geometric-sum bound (4) (p. 5), which yields m1/2+o(1)m^{1/2+o(1)}.

Dependencies

The Kloosterman-sum bound (1) (p. 3), which the paper cites from the literature, and the elementary bound (4) (p. 5).

Bears on

  • Problem 158: indirect only. The theorem counts all points of one congruence xy≡a(modm)xy\equiv a\pmod m with xx in an interval and yy in intervals, and says nothing about Problem 158 itself.