Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 55). A set AA of integers is a Sidon set when all the sums a+a′a+a' with a,a′∈Aa,a'\in A are distinct. A finite Sidon set A⊂[1,N]A\subset[1,N] is maximal for this NN when no Sidon set A′A' with A⊂A′⊂[1,N]A\subset A'\subset[1,N], A′≠AA'\ne A, exists.

Theorem (unnumbered, p. 55, quoted). "There is a maximal Sidon set in [1,N][1,N] such that ∣A∣≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3|A|\ll(N\log N)^{1/3}."

The implied constant is absolute and not made explicit. The paper notes on p. 55 that an easy counting argument gives ∣A∣≫N1/3|A|\gg N^{1/3} for every maximal Sidon set, and that Erdős, Sárközy and Sós asked whether this can be improved.

Remark (pp. 57--58). Writing g(N)g(N) for the least size of a maximal Sidon set in [1,N][1,N], the paper records N1/3≪g(N)≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3N^{1/3}\ll g(N)\ll(N\log N)^{1/3} (its display (4), p. 57). It observes that if the right side were the true order, this would immediately give the Ajtai--Komlós--Szemerédi theorem on an infinite Sidon set with ≫(Nlog⁡N)1/3\gg(N\log N)^{1/3} elements up to NN, and the author says he has no heuristic argument indicating which side of (4) is correct (p. 58).

Source. Imre Z. Ruzsa, A Small Maximal Sidon Set, The Ramanujan Journal 2 (1998), 55--58, doi:10.1023/A:1009757824153. Pages are the journal's printed pages. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions, the statement and the Remark were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 55--57. Take a prime pp, put q=1+p+p2q=1+p+p^2, and take a Sidon set B={b0,…,bp}⊂[1,q]B=\{b_0,\ldots,b_p\}\subset[1,q] modulo qq, of size p+1p+1 (cited to Halberstam and Roth). For integers did_i the lifts ai=bi+diqa_i=b_i+d_iq form a Sidon set A0A_0, inside [1,N][1,N] when 0≤di≤M−10\le d_i\le M-1, M=[N/q]M=[N/q]. An integer mm can be added to A0A_0 only if neither m=au+av−awm=a_u+a_v-a_w nor 2m=au+av2m=a_u+a_v is solvable (the paper's (1)), and (1) forces m≡bu+bv−bw(modq)m\equiv b_u+b_v-b_w\pmod q (the paper's (2)). With the did_i independent and uniform on {0,…,M−1}\{0,\ldots,M-1\}, the Lemma gives at least p/8p/8 disjoint triplets for each m≢bim\not\equiv b_i, each blocking mm with probability at least c/Mc/M (for M>M0M>M_0), so mm stays unblocked with probability at most exp⁡(−cp3/(8N))\exp(-cp^3/(8N)). Taking p>(CNlog⁡N)1/3p>(CN\log N)^{1/3} with C=8/cC=8/c, by Chebyshev's theorem with p≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3p\ll(N\log N)^{1/3}, makes this less than 1/N1/N, so some choice blocks every m≢bu(modq)m\not\equiv b_u\pmod q. Any maximal Sidon extension then adds only elements a≡bu(modq)a\equiv b_u\pmod q, and the distinct multiples a−aua-a_u of qq in (1−N,N−1)(1-N,N-1) number at most 1+2N/q≪N1/31+2N/q\ll N^{1/3} (p. 57).

Dependencies

A Sidon set of size p+1p+1 modulo q=1+p+p2q=1+p+p^2 (cited to Halberstam and Roth, p. 55); the paper's Lemma (p. 56); Chebyshev's theorem on primes (p. 57).

Bears on

  • Problem 156: the problem asks whether a maximal Sidon set in {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} of size O(N1/3)O(N^{1/3}) exists. The Theorem gives one of size O((Nlog⁡N)1/3)O((N\log N)^{1/3}), and display (4) records the lower bound g(N)≫N1/3g(N)\gg N^{1/3}; the factor (log⁡N)1/3(\log N)^{1/3} remains, and the paper does not answer the question.