Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 145). For a set AA of integers and n∈Zn\in\mathbb Z, σ(n)=σA(n)\sigma(n)=\sigma_A(n) is the number of ordered pairs (a,a′)∈A2(a,a')\in A^2 with a+a′=na+a'=n, and δ(n)=δA(n)\delta(n)=\delta_A(n) the number with a−a′=na-a'=n. The interval [a,b][a,b] denotes the set of integers between aa and bb.

Theorem 1 (pp. 145--146, quoted). "Let pp be an odd prime for which (2p)=−1\left(\frac{2}{p}\right)=-1. There exists a set of integers A⊂[0,3p2]A\subset[0,3p^2], ∣A∣⩽12p|A|\leqslant12p such that A+A⊃[2p2,4p2]A+A\supset[2p^2,4p^2], (1.1) σ(n)⩽288\sigma(n)\leqslant288 for all nn and δ(n)⩽288\delta(n)\leqslant288 for all nn with at most 1111 exceptions."

The proof (p. 149) names the exceptional differences as n=0n=0, ±p\pm p, ±2p\pm2p, ±(p2−p)\pm(p^2-p), ±p2\pm p^2, ±(p2+p)\pm(p^2+p). Remark 1.1 (p. 146) notes that δ(0)=∣A∣\delta(0)=|A| and that the author cannot reduce the number of exceptions to one. Remark 1.2 (p. 146) puts N=3p2N=3p^2: the sumset then covers an interval of length cNcN with bounded representation counts, and the author observes that if this interval were an initial segment [0,cN][0,cN] the sets could be combined into a basis with bounded σ(n)\sigma(n); since it is not, only the weaker Theorem 2 follows.

Source. Imre Z. Ruzsa, A Just Basis, Monatsh. Math. 109 (1990), 145--151, doi:10.1007/BF01302934. Labels and pages are those of the journal print: the definitions and the start of Theorem 1 on p. 145, its conclusion and Remarks 1.1--1.2 on p. 146, the proof in Section 3 on pp. 148--149. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions and the statement were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 148--149. Identify residues mod pp with 0,…,p−10,\ldots,p-1 and map G=Zp2G=\mathbb Z_p^2 into the nonnegative integers by φ(a,b)=a+2pb\varphi(a,b)=a+2pb. Lemma 3.1 (p. 148) shows that φ\varphi does not increase sum or difference counts, so B′=φ(B)B'=\varphi(B), with BB the set of Lemma 2.2, has all such counts at most 1818 (differences away from 00), and that for each 0≤n<p20\le n<p^2 one of n−pn-p, nn, n+pn+p, n+p2−pn+p^2-p, n+p2n+p^2, n+p2+pn+p^2+p lies in B′+B′B'+B'. The union B′′B'' of the translates of B′B' by −p2-p^2, −p-p, 00, pp then has B′′+B′′⊃[0,p2]B''+B''\supset[0,p^2], and A=B′′+p2A=B''+p^2 is the required set (p. 149): sixteen sub-equations with at most 1818 solutions each give 288288, and the differences of the four shifts give the eleven exceptions.

Dependencies

Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 3.1 (p. 148).

Bears on

  • Problem 28: the problem asserts that a set whose sumset contains all large integers has unbounded 1A∗1A1_A\ast1_A. Theorem 1 bounds the counts only for a finite set whose sumset covers [2p2,4p2][2p^2,4p^2], not an initial segment, and does not decide the problem (Remark 1.2, p. 146).
  • Problem 1192: Theorem 1 is the finite input to Theorem 2, which gives the case r=2r=2; on its own it says nothing about a basis of N\mathbb N.