Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Section 4, Remarks, p. 655, of J. Folkman, On the representation of integers as sums of distinct terms from a fixed sequence, Canad. J. Math. 18 (1966), 643--655, doi:10.4153/CJM-1966-065-2. The edition read is identified on the source card.
Statement
In the paper "increasing" means and "strictly increasing" means ; is subcomplete when its set of sums of distinct terms contains an infinite arithmetic progression.
Counterexamples for (p. 655). Let . The paper says that it is easy to construct an increasing sequence with for which
and such a sequence is not subcomplete; a similar construction gives a strictly increasing sequence satisfying (4.1) and . The paper concludes that its theorems, among them Theorem 1.3, are false for . The constructions are described, not written out. The paper adds that Cassels (Acta Sci. Math. Szeged 21 (1960), 111--124) constructs counterexamples to Theorem 1.2 and to the strictly increasing case of Theorem 1.3 for that also satisfy for an arbitrary preassigned .
Open questions (p. 655). The paper leaves open:
- Whether every increasing sequence with for all is subcomplete.
- Whether every strictly increasing sequence with for , where , is subcomplete. The paper notes that is required so that cannot satisfy (4.1).
The two questions are the boundary case of the growth conditions (1.1) and (1.3), which neither the theorems () nor the counterexamples () cover.
Read depth. Claims checked: the section was read clause by clause on the print. The constructions and Cassels's paper were not read.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External: Cassels's counterexamples, cited, not proved.
Bears on
- Problem 343: the first open question is the problem's question in Folkman's form, for a nondecreasing sequence with , the constant depending on the sequence. The paper gives no answer. Its increasing counterexample with , , has at least terms up to , so counting functions of order do not force subcompleteness.
- Problem 344: the second open question concerns strictly increasing sequences with quadratic growth for , ; such a set has at least elements up to once that number is at least , and , so the question is of the square-root density the problem asks about. The paper gives no answer.