Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 1). For g∈Ng\in\mathbb N, B2[g]B_2[g] is the class of sets A⊂NA\subset\mathbb N such that for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb N the equation a+a′=na+a'=n with a,a′∈Aa,a'\in A and a≤a′a\le a' has at most gg solutions; B2[1]B_2[1] is the class of Sidon sets. The counting function is A(x)=#{a≤x:a∈A}A(x)=\#\{a\le x : a\in A\}.

Theorem 1 (p. 2, quoted). "For all g≥2g\ge2 there exists an infinite B2[g]B_2[g] sequence AA such that lim sup⁡x→∞A(x)x=Lg\limsup_{x\to\infty}\frac{A(x)}{\sqrt x}=L_g where"

Lg={3/2,g=2,3/2,g=3,36/11,g=4,9/2,g=5,100/17,g=6,27/4,g=7,8,g=8,322g−1,g≥9.L_g= \begin{cases} \sqrt{3/2}, & g=2,\\ 3/2, & g=3,\\ \sqrt{36/11}, & g=4,\\ \sqrt{9/2}, & g=5,\\ \sqrt{100/17}, & g=6,\\ \sqrt{27/4}, & g=7,\\ \sqrt8, & g=8,\\ \dfrac{3}{2\sqrt2}\sqrt{g-1}, & g\ge9. \end{cases}

In particular (the case g=2g=2) there is an infinite B2[2]B_2[2] sequence with lim sup⁡x→∞A(x)/x=3/2\limsup_{x\to\infty}A(x)/\sqrt x=\sqrt{3/2}, against the value 11 of Kolountzakis's earlier infinite B2[2]B_2[2] sequence that the introduction cites (p. 1).

The abstract (p. 1) states the formula 322g−1\frac{3}{2\sqrt2}\sqrt{g-1} for every g≥2g\ge2, with better values for small gg. Compared here with the table: the tabulated value equals the formula at g=3,5,7g=3,5,7, exceeds it at g=2,6,8g=2,6,8, and falls below it at g=4g=4 (36/11≈1.809\sqrt{36/11}\approx1.809 against 27/8≈1.837\sqrt{27/8}\approx1.837).

Scope of the printed proof

For g≥9g\ge9 the proof of Proposition 2 (p. 4) takes Cg=Ag−1C_g=A^{g-1}, where $A^g={k : 0\le k\le g-1}\cup{g-1+2k : 1\le k\le [g/2]}$ is a set the paper credits to Cilleruelo, Ruzsa and Trujillo (reference [1], a preprint), and asserts that property iii), the ratio ∣Cg∣/ug+1=Lg|C_g|/\sqrt{u_g+1}=L_g, is easy to see. Computed here: with ugu_g the largest element of CgC_g, the ratio is 322g−1\frac{3}{2\sqrt2}\sqrt{g-1} when gg is odd, but 3g−422g−3\frac{3g-4}{2\sqrt{2g-3}} when gg is even, slightly smaller (at g=10g=10, 13/17≈3.15313/\sqrt{17}\approx3.153 against ≈3.182\approx3.182); a larger ugu_g only lowers it. So in the version read the proof reaches the stated LgL_g for 2≤g≤82\le g\le8 and for odd g≥9g\ge9, and for even g≥10g\ge10 it gives an infinite B2[g]B_2[g] sequence with the smaller value 3g−422g−3\frac{3g-4}{2\sqrt{2g-3}} in place of LgL_g.

Proof pointer

Pp. 2--4. Any finite B2[g]B_2[g] set A0A_0 with largest element xx is extended by a block D=⋃c∈Cg(Bp+cm+2x)D=\bigcup_{c\in C_g}(B_p+cm+2x), where pp is a prime with x2<p<2x2x^2<p<2x^2 and m=p2−1m=p^2-1. Proposition 1 (p. 2) supplies Bp⊂(p1/2,p2−p1/2)B_p\subset(p^{1/2},p^2-p^{1/2}) with more than p−4p1/2p-4p^{1/2} elements, pairwise more than p1/2p^{1/2} apart, whose pairwise sums are distinct modulo mm; it is cut down (p. 4) from a modular Sidon set of pp elements in [1,p2−1][1,p^2-1] that the paper attributes to Chowla and Erdős, citing Halberstam and Roth. Proposition 2 (p. 2) supplies an integer ugu_g and a set Cg⊂[0,ug]C_g\subset[0,u_g] whose representation function rr satisfies i) r(n)≤gr(n)\le g for all nn, ii) r(c)≤g−1r(c)\le g-1 and r(c−1)≤g−1r(c-1)\le g-1 for c∈Cgc\in C_g, and iii) ∣Cg∣/ug+1=Lg|C_g|/\sqrt{u_g+1}=L_g; for g≤8g\le8 the sets are listed explicitly on p. 4. Proposition 3 (p. 3) shows that A0∪DA_0\cup D is again B2[g]B_2[g], by reducing a representation to one of the form c+c′c+c' (or c+c′c+c' equal to c0c_0 or c0−1c_0-1 when one summand lies in A0A_0), and Proposition 4 (p. 4) shows that the ratio at the last element is Lg+o(1)L_g+o(1). Repeating the extension gives the infinite sequence.

Read depth

Claims checked: the definition of B2[g]B_2[g] and of A(x)A(x), the statement of Theorem 1 with its table, and the statements of Propositions 1 to 4 were read clause by clause on the pages of the print; the proofs were read but not checked step by step. Two checks were computed here: the arithmetic of the table and of ∣Cg∣/ug+1|C_g|/\sqrt{u_g+1} above, and properties i) and ii) of Proposition 2 for the listed sets C2,…,C8C_2,\ldots,C_8 and for Ag−1A^{g-1} with 9≤g≤209\le g\le20, which hold whether rr counts ordered or unordered pairs (the paper does not say which; the reduction in Proposition 3 needs ordered pairs). Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. External inputs named by the paper: the Chowla--Erdős modular Sidon set (via Halberstam and Roth, Sequences) and the representation bound for AgA^g from the Cilleruelo--Ruzsa--Trujillo preprint.

Source. J. Cilleruelo and C. Trujillo, Infinite B2[g]B_2[g] sequences, Israel Journal of Mathematics 126 (2001), 263--267, doi:10.1007/BF02784156, read in the four-page author-typeset version named on the source card; pages here are that version's printed pages 1--4, not the journal's.

Bears on

  • Problem 158: the g=2g=2 case gives an infinite set of the problem's kind (at most two solutions of a+b=na+b=n with a≤ba\le b) with lim sup⁡A(N)/N1/2=3/2\limsup A(N)/N^{1/2}=\sqrt{3/2}. The problem asks about the limit inferior, on which the theorem says nothing; it neither answers nor refutes the question.
  • Problem 329: the problem asks for the largest lim sup⁡A(N)/N1/2\limsup A(N)/N^{1/2} of a Sidon set (g=1g=1). The theorem concerns g≥2g\ge2, a wider class of sets, and gives no bound for Sidon sets; the problem's site lists the paper among its references.