Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be Jacobsthal's function, defined to as the minimal such that, if has at most prime factors, then in any set of consecutive integers there exists an integer coprime to . Determine the order of magnitude of . In particular, is it true that
Source: erdosproblems.com/970
No claim settles this problem.
Open. The displayed question, , is answered yes by
the accepted partial claim of 25 September 2026 (the
claim page (OpenAI, 2026)): the
OpenAI release's Lean declaration
OAI.Erdos970.Erdos970Final.erdos_970_quadratic, which states
for one absolute and which this corpus built, axiom-checked and audited
against the formulation above on 2026-10-07, the claim's only acceptance
evidence. The manuscript claims the sharper ,
which the release proves in a separate declaration, erdos_970_iterated_log,
that this corpus has not axiom-checked or accepted; the manuscript has no
refereed version and no outside review known here. The order of magnitude, to
which the label attaches, stays open between the lower bounds below and the
accepted quadratic bound. The bounds in hand from the search,
whose scope the Current assessment records: the refereed upper bound
(the claim page
Iwaniec 1978,
accepted, partial), the Corollary of [Iw78], p. 226, for
the longest run of consecutive integers each divisible by one of arbitrary
primes, where is the same function as Erdős's 1965
([FGKMT18] attests the primorial case , and Erdős's 1965 lecture
had ); and two lower bounds, Erdős's 1965 display (29),
, and the bound obtained from
[FGKMT18]'s (1.2) through the identity above,
, an authored one-line derivation recorded
below and on the claim page
Ford, Green, Konyagin, Maynard and Tao 2014
(accepted, partial). The site's commentary prints the best lower bound as
and attributes it to [FGKMT18]; that
display is weaker than both source-supported bounds, by a factor of
against (29) and against the derived bound, is recorded
here as the site's, with the discrepancy noted as a site-versus-source matter;
it does not affect the label. Jacobsthal's conjecture was
already "hopeless at present" for Erdős in 1965. This is a bounded negative
finding, not a certificate of openness.