Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be a graph with vertices and edges. Must contain two vertices of the same degree which are joined by a path of length ?
Let be a graph with vertices and edges, where . Must contain two vertices of the same degree which are joined by a path of length ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/816
A full solution has been claimed but not yet accepted. The statement is true.
PROVED, the site's label, resting on the commentary's credit to [ChMa25], whose theorem needs . The corrected Statement is proved for by Theorem 2 of [ChMa25] (J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 179 (2026), 1--18; refereed; cited from arXiv v1), in the stronger form that is the only graph with vertices and at least edges without such a pair; it is recorded as an accepted partial claim on Chen and Ma's claim page (2025). The preprint [LiZe25] (arXiv:2505.00523v2, August 2025) states the same theorem for every (its Theorem 1.3), which is the whole corrected Statement, and presents it as resolving the question completely; no journal record and no independent review of it was found on 2026-09-18, its proof (pp. 2--14) is unread, and it is recorded as the pending full claim on Liu and Zeng's claim page (2025). The derived standing is therefore claimed, proved: the range rests on [LiZe25] alone, and the case is also checked by hand below. The site's wording, which also admits , fails there (see Notes).
The site's wording leaves free, so it includes , where it is false. A path of length is a path with three edges and four distinct vertices: this is the reading under which the site's own example works ( has edges, its equal-degree vertices lie on one side, and a path with an odd number of edges joins the two sides), and it is the reading of [ChMa25] (proof of Lemma 4, p. 3: " is a path of length three joining and "). At the graph has vertices and edges, so it is ; its three vertices all have degree , but a graph on three vertices contains no path with four vertices, so no two of them are joined by a path of length , and the answer is no. The check needs no source. The change inserts "where ", which excludes exactly , the one value at which, because of its size, no graph can meet the conclusion; it is the corpus's own correction. The first value above it, , holds for all four graphs (checked in the Current assessment). No source of higher rank supplies a range: Erdős's [Er91] was not read, and the statements of his question as Problem 1 of [ChMa25] (p. 1) and Problem 1.1 of [LiZe25] (p. 1) carry no range on , so the missing range is not the site's alone; the site's commentary gives the range of Chen and Ma's theorem, which is a theorem's hypothesis and not the form. The form follows from the size of the failing instance alone, not from the range of any theorem; the formal-conjectures statement file states the same range . Results about the site's wording, credited and never counted: the failure at is this corpus's own check, first recorded on this page on 2026-09-18; the formal-conjectures statement file, added on 2026-09-20, notes that at the graph is a triangle with no path of length ; and the docstring of Boris Alexeev's Lean development (commit of 15 September 2026) names as a counterexample at . The page's standing judges the corrected Statement.