Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Suppose . We say that an edge-colouring of using colours is balanced if every vertex sees exactly many edges of each colours.
For which graphs is it true that, if , for all large , every balanced edge-colouring of with colours contains a rainbow copy of ? (That is, a subgraph isomorphic to where each edge receives a different colour.)
Source: erdosproblems.com/811
No claim settles this problem.
Open: the site labels the problem OPEN (last edited 14 October 2025), and the classification is not known. Excluded from the answer set by refereed sources: Axenovich and Clemen 2022 (J. Graph Theory 106 (2024)) exclude every clique with and (their Theorem 1.4), every graph with an odd number of edges containing a clique on vertices (their Theorem 3.3) and all but of the clique sizes (their Theorem 1.2, through their Lemma 4.1: no perfect difference set of size in excludes ), and Clemen and Wagner 2023 (Electron. J. Combin. 30 (2023), Theorem 1.2) exclude . Two further exclusions are inferences taken on this page: , since a perfect difference set of size would be a projective plane of order , which does not exist (Lemma 4.1 with the Bruck--Ryser theorem), and every with and not a prime power (Lemma 4.1 with the computational verification of the prime power conjecture that the paper cites and this corpus has not read). The case is announced without proof, so of the cliques on at most twelve vertices , , , and are not excluded in the sources found, and Conjecture 1.3 of Axenovich and Clemen predicts every with . On the other side Erdős and Tuza 1993 place the forests, and in the answer set: their Theorem 2 (p. 82) gives exactly, their Theorem 3 (p. 83) gives for the quantitative version, and their Proposition 1 (p. 83) gives for a forest with edges ( for a tree), below for large ; the paper's own summary (p. 81) names only the trees, and , "the only graphs for which we can prove that they satisfy the requirements of Problems 1 and 2". The cycle that Erdős singled out is open in the sources found. A forum comment of 15 September 2026 claims a Lean-verified proof of Conjecture 1.3, recorded as the unreviewed partial claim Kitamura 2026, which would exclude every clique on at least four vertices and leave the classification open. The search, whose scope the Current assessment records, found nothing else. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.