Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Describe the size of the second largest component of the random graph on vertices, where each edge is included independently with probability .
Source: erdosproblems.com/745
An accepted solution exists. Settled in another form, for example when its parts resolve differently or the question is open-ended.
PROVED is the site's label, which credits Komlós, Sulyok and Szemerédi's 1980 paper [KSS80] (Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 15 (1980), 391--395) with proving Erdős's expectation that the second largest component has size almost surely. The standing in the frontmatter is derived from the claim pages and differs from the label. [KSS80] is not held (the routes tried are recorded below), and its theorem is known second-hand, from the site's commentary, from a thread comment of 25 August 2026, which says that [KSS80] assumes strictly, and from the docstring of an external Lean file describing "the KSS logarithmic upper bound" as holding "for each fixed supercritical parameter": for every fixed the second largest component of has vertices with high probability. Erdős himself attests the resolution in the added-in-proof sentence of his 1981 paper ("These questions were cleared up by Komlós and Szemerédi", [Er81], Part VIII, copy p. 16). The problem fixes , that is , where the theorem says nothing and where the second largest component is not of order but of order , the order of the largest components in the critical window (Erdős and Rényi 1960 [ErRe60] prove that order at for the greatest tree, Theorem 7c, and state it for the largest component in their summary on p. 52; Aldous 1997 [Al97] proves the limit law of all the largest components, the second included, at ). So Erdős's expectation, stated for the whole process ("never be large, perhaps not much larger than and certainly ", [Er81], copy p. 16), holds for fixed and fails at the asked parameter. The theorem is correct, but it answers the supercritical case the site's label credits (), not the Statement (), so it does not count toward the problem's standing, and its claim page, Komlós, Sulyok and Szemerédi 1980, is rejected. The accepted full claim is Aldous 1997, refereed: for fixed the component sizes of , scaled by , converge in law to Brownian excursion lengths, so at , the asked parameter, ; this describes what the problem asks for, so the claim's value is solved. Two Lean developments reach the same order and are pending full claims: Boris Alexeev's Alexeev 2026, which also gives the logarithmic order with its coefficient for every fixed , and Jingxuan Ding's Ding 2026, a five-regime atlas of the sparse evolution of the uniform model . This corpus has built neither, and the search recorded below found the site's label unchanged. Whether the label can stand at the literal parameter is a question of the catalog's labeling that this page records; the two parameters are stated side by side below.