Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let . If is sufficiently large and is a graph on vertices with no and at least edges then contains a set of vertices containing no triangle.
Source: erdosproblems.com/533
An accepted solution exists. The statement is false.
DISPROVED (LEAN), the site's label on 2026-09-18 (page last edited 27 January 2026). The status-defining source is Theorem 3 of Balogh and Lenz (Israel J. Math. 194 (2013), no. 1, 45--68, refereed; cited from the arXiv v2): for and , with , ; at , this is , the value the paper displays after its Problem 5. So : for every and all large there are -free graphs on vertices with and at least edges, and the statement fails for (the deduction is written out below). The exact threshold is : the upper bound is the origin paper's (not held; stated first-hand by four of its authors in 1983 and attested by [BaLe13] and [LRSS21]; an accepted partial claim on the Erdős–Hajnal–Simonovits–Sós–Szemerédi claim page (1994)), and the matching construction is Theorem 1.1 of Liu, Reiher, Sharifzadeh and Staden (Corollary 1.2 and Theorem 1.4: ; J. Eur. Math. Soc., Crossref record of 20 October 2025; cited from the arXiv v2 of 18 August 2025). The two disproofs are recorded as accepted full claims, refereed and credited by the site, on the Balogh–Lenz claim page (2011) and the Liu–Reiher–Sharifzadeh–Staden claim page (2021); the public Lean proof of the disproof, recorded under Formalization, is linked from the second and is not counted as formalized evidence, since the corpus has not built it.