Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Is it true that, if is sparse enough and does not cover all residue classes modulo for any prime , then there exists some such that is prime for all ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/429
An accepted solution exists. The statement is false.
Disproved. The status-defining source is Theorem 1 of D. Weisenberg, Sparse admissible sets and a problem of Erdős and Graham, Integers 24 (2024), Article A89 (received 24 June 2024, accepted 20 September 2024, published 9 October 2024; a refereed journal): for every nondecreasing unbounded there is an admissible with for all such that no integer makes a set of primes. So no sparsity threshold exists and the answer is no. The claim page Weisenberg 2024 records the result as accepted on the refereed publication; the standing in the frontmatter is derived from it. The site's curator is not an independent reviewer of this result: the paper's acknowledgement records that he reviewed an earlier draft and advised the author, so his label is not acceptance evidence. The site records DISPROVED (LEAN); the suffix is a catalog label explained under Formalization and the Lean label below; the two external Lean files have not been built or audited in this corpus. The site's further sentence that a variant of the construction also answers Erdős's squarefree () question in the negative is the site's statement: the paper does not treat squarefree numbers.