Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let count the number of distinct sums of the form for . Estimate .
Source: erdosproblems.com/320
An accepted solution exists. Settled in another form, for example when its parts resolve differently or the question is open-ended.
Solved, in the site's label, which the site glosses as a resolution other than a proof or disproof, for the order of magnitude
The lower bound of this order is refereed: Bettin, Grenié, Molteni and Sanna's Theorem 1 (Math. Comp., online 22 January 2026), on its claim page (Bettin Grenie Molteni Sanna, 2025). The earlier lower bounds of Bleicher and Erdős (Math. Comp. 1975; Illinois J. Math. 1976) hold only for and respectively, and fall short of this order by an unbounded factor; the 1975 bound is on its claim page (Bleicher Erdos, 1975). The refereed upper bound (Bleicher and Erdős 1976, Theorem 3, on its claim page (Bleicher Erdos, 1976)) is weaker by the factor . The upper bound of the same order is a proof obtained with the AI system GPT 5.6 Sol Pro, submitted to the site's proof-claim tab on 15 July 2026 by Young, Zhu and Luo and accepted by the site as correct, with the site maintainer's exposition of 1 September 2026; its manuscript sits behind an Overleaf read link that served no document to a request on 2026-09-18, its Lean file covers finite combinatorial steps only, and no refereed publication or independent review of it was found on 2026-09-18. A second claim (Kominers and Neu, 22 July 2026) asserts a full asymptotic with a non-constant phase and has not been accepted. The two forum claims have their pages, the accepted order of magnitude and the pending asymptotic; with the three refereed bounds linked above, the standing derives from the five pages.