Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let and be sufficiently large depending on . Is there a graph on vertices with many edges which contains no such that the largest independent set has size at most ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/22
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
Proved. The site's label reads "PROVED (LEAN)"; its suffix is
a catalog label explained under Formalization. The status-defining source is
Theorem 1.9 of Fox, Loh and Zhao (Combinatorica 35 (2015), no. 4, 435--476,
refereed): there is an absolute constant such that for
each positive integer there is an -vertex -free graph with at
least edges and independence number at most
. Since the factor
tends to , the independence number is
at most once is large in terms of , which answers
the question with yes for every . Bollobás and Erdős's own
Theorem (1976) gives for , that is, graphs
with edges, which is why they left the threshold case as a
question. The companion Theorem 1.8 of the same paper shows the independence
number cannot be pushed below at edges, so the
construction is within a factor of order
of best possible. The claim page is
Fox, Loh and Zhao
(accepted on the refereed publication and the curator's credit); the 2026
Lean proof in the lean-proofs repository declares itself a formalization of
their theorem and is recorded on that page as a formalization link; it
gives no formalized evidence.