CollapseProblem 20Let f(n,k)f(n,k)f(n,k) be minimal such that every family F\mathcal{F}F of nnn-uniform sets with ∣F∣≥f(n,k)\lvert \mathcal{F}\rvert \geq f(n,k)∣F∣≥f(n,k) contains a kkk-sunflower. Is it true that f(n,k)<cknf(n,k) < c_k^nf(n,k)<ckn for some constant ck>0c_k>0ck>0?Source: erdosproblems.com/20CombinatoricsWiki pageStatusOpenNo claim settles this problem.ReferencesALWZ20Alweiss, R. and Lovett, S. and Wu, K. and Zhang, J., Improved bounds for the sunflower lemma. (2020).BCW21Bell, T. and Chueluecha, S. and Warnke, L., Note on sunflowers. Discret. Math. (2021).Er81Erdős, P., On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved. Combinatorica (1981), 25-42.ErRa60Erdős, P. and Rado, R., Intersection theorems for systems of sets. J. London Math. Soc. (1960), 85-90.FKNP19Frankston, K. and Kahn, J. and Narayanan, B. and Park, J., Thresholds versus fractional expectation-thresholds. CoRR (2019).KRT99Kostochka, A. V. and Rödl, V. and Talysheva, L. A., On systems of small sets with no large Δ\DeltaΔ-subsystems. Combin. Probab. Comput. (1999), 265-268.Ko97Kostochka, A., A bound on the cardinality of families not containing Δ\DeltaΔ-systems. (1997).Ra20Rao, A., Coding for sunflowers. Discrete Analysis (2020).