Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Any graph on vertices can be decomposed into many edge-disjoint cycles and edges.
Source: erdosproblems.com/184
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
OPEN, the site's label (page last edited 1 April 2026; proof-claim
tab read 2026-10-07); the derived standing of this page is solved, proved. The
two differ because the standing rests on a theorem the label does not reflect:
the site's page was last edited before either 2026 claim, and the release's
theorem below is not on the site's proof-claim tab. Theorem 1.1 of the OpenAI
mathematics release's preprint of 24 September 2026 gives an absolute with
for every . It is recorded on
its claim page (OpenAI, 2026)
as accepted, with evidence formalized only: the corpus's verification of
2026-10-07 built the release's Lean declarations OAI.ErdosGallai.erdos_gallai,
MainStatement, EdgeDecomposition and CycleOrSingleEdge at the pinned
revision, found exactly the axioms propext, Classical.choice and
Quot.sound, and audited the formal statement for fidelity to the question, an
audit that belongs to that evidence and is not an outside review; no outside
reviewer is recorded, the informal manuscript is unrefereed and its proof was
read for structure only. A second full claim, Ryan Coffey's Lean-formalized
proof of the formal-conjectures statement (1 October 2026), is recorded as
claimed on
its claim page (Coffey, 2026).
Before these, the best upper bound in the refereed record was
Bucić and Montgomery's Theorem 2,
with the iterated logarithm (Adv. Math. 437
(2024), refereed; cited from the arXiv v2), after Conlon, Fox and Sudakov's
(Random Structures Algorithms 45 (2014), refereed) and the
classical that the 1966 paper asserts; it remains the best refereed
bound. The lower bounds are from Gallai's graph
(1966) and from the complete bipartite graphs
, the construction Bucić and Montgomery give for Erdős's 1983
remark, so the constant is at least and is not determined. The
conjecture was known for the random graph and for graphs of linear
minimum degree (Conlon, Fox and Sudakov, Theorems 1.3 and 1.4). The search whose
scope the Current assessment records predates both claims and found neither a
proof nor a disproof.