Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
The strong chromatic index of a graph , denoted by , is the minimum such that the edges of can be partitioned into sets of 'strongly independent' edges, that is, such that the subgraph of induced by each set is the union of vertex-disjoint edges.
Is it true that, for any graph with maximum degree ,
Source: erdosproblems.com/149
No claim settles this problem.
Open. No proof, disproof or proof claim for the statement was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records. The best refereed upper bound is for every graph with at least some (Hurley, de Joannis de Verclos and Kang, Theorem 1.6, Advances in Combinatorics 2022), after Molloy and Reed's , Bruhn and Joos's and Bonamy, Perrett and Postle's , all for large ; a preprint of July 2026 (Davey, Hurley, de Joannis de Verclos, Kang and Volec, Theorem 1.1) claims for large , unrefereed. The statement is proved for (, Horák, He and Trotter 1993 and, independently, Andersen 1992; see their claim pages (Andersen, 1992)), for -free graphs of large by Mahdian's bound (claim page (Mahdian, 2000)), for graphs of large without a fixed bipartite subgraph by Vu's extension of that bound (claim page (Vu, 2002)), and for the site records against the conjectured (Huang, Santana and Yu 2018). The clique form stands at (Faron and Postle, refereed), with a 2026 preprint at , and reaches for triangle-free graphs. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.