Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let . Is there a constant such that, for all large , every graph on vertices with at least edges must contain a subgraph on at most vertices which is non-planar?
Source: erdosproblems.com/1018
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
Solved (the site's label SOLVED; on 2026-10-07 the page printed no label, and the community database listed the problem as solved (Lean), with a last update of 16 September 2026). The answer is yes: Kostochka and Pyber (Combinatorica 8 (1988), no. 1, 83--86; refereed) state Erdős's question in their introduction and answer it with their Theorem (p. 83): "Every contains a of size at most for all and ", where is a graph with vertices and edges and a topological complete graph (a subdivided ) of vertices; "This result answers the question of Erdős" (p. 83). Library home: Kostochka and Pyber 1988, result page Theorem. With this gives a non-planar subgraph on vertices in every graph with edges once is large (an authored conversion below); the site's account and the restatement in Janzer's refereed paper of 2021 (Bull. London Math. Soc. 53, 108--118; quoted from its arXiv copy) agree with the printed statement. The label rests on Erdős's question, the site's acceptance and the Theorem as printed; the proof (p. 85) was followed for structure and not checked. The claim page Kostochka and Pyber records the result, its acceptance evidence and its postings, and the standing derives from it: the question is answered in the affirmative, so the claim's value is proved, while this sentence keeps the site's label. Jiang (J. Graph Theory 67 (2011), 139--152; not held) later sharpened the bound, as Janzer reports.